Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (11170)	11/8/2009 5:17:09 PM
From: wlcnyc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

Thanks, for the response. It helps to understand what one perceives as radical. In your first example, one would have to know specifically what views/actions are espoused by each category in the "political continuum." Only then could one judge what is outside of them - left or right - to be radical. I would certainly fail that test. However, in the examples that you gave for what Obama would have to favor to be considered radical, I noticed some which seem to be favored by - or close to - some of his advisors, appointees, etc. Then your second definition is based on history or tradition. Again, I say that some of those "around" him do seem to fit that description. I think we also tend to judge the tactics of the other guys by the tactics and beliefs of their advisers. Just my thoughts on the subject. Thanks again. Bill