Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Candle stick who wrote (10956)	10/31/1997 4:40:00 PM
From: John Gault	Respond to of 55532

Candlestick, Hop on your AOL account. I would like to speak to you, thanks.

To: Candle stick who wrote (10956)	10/31/1997 4:57:00 PM
From: Kenny Low	Respond to of 55532

s martin, thanks , but it would seem to me that the fundamentals are irrelevant at this point. RMIL appears to be a pure supply demand play and nothing more. Nothing wrong with that, so long as you know what you are getting into......I take it you are caught short? I think you're getting the hang of it now. Welcome to RMIL. -Ken- #6

To: Candle stick who wrote (10956)	10/31/1997 5:21:00 PM
From: s martin	Respond to of 55532

You're welcome, I am neither long nor short. If there had not been so many lies by the "leaders" here, I might have bought for a squeeze play, as I despise the shorters who try to grind small investors into the ground. They are of course aided and abetted by the companies themselves who issue tons of RegS stock. What I have seen though, has convinced me this could be a sham, that there are no shorts at all. I wouldn't want to get stuck holding this stock on the long side, given the fundamentals and the liars.

To: Candle stick who wrote (10956)	10/31/1997 5:49:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

'Stick, before leaving , I wanted to give you another perspective. Consider that this stock was shorted to $.19/share. If SMartin is correct and there is no short position, how did the value of the stock get to where it is today, 2 5/16?...If there was no short position, then we must assume it was on the co.s' fundamentals. The co. has also merged, attempting to meet AMEX criteria to liberate itself from this kind of manipulation. If the stock is going vertical from .19, Wouldn't a short see this stock as a 'new' short position? Take into considertaION why people are on this thread. SMartin has been on the thread from early this morning w/ no position in RMIL., Why isn't he applying his wealth of knowledge to stocks he has a position in?, Best to you, Pugs