Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (527090)	11/9/2009 10:07:17 AM
From: koan	1 Recommendation Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 1575399

I could list stuff Beck has said that is wrong all day long. But if I take the time to do it, you will just brush it off like you always do with any facts liberals put forth to you, so it is a big waste of my time. You have no interest in knowing the truth about anything that goes against your ideology. What have I got wrong below? I took a bike ride this morning thinking about Chomsky. I think he simply thinks deeper than most and has more variables at his command to consider more sophisticated realities. He is also committed to telling the truth to the best of his ability and is only constrained in his logical thinking by his illogical human mind. It is easy to get on the wrong side of even liberals with logical ideas. E.g. probably most of the big problems in the world are more dilemmas than problems, and as such, really have no viable solutions one would attach to a problem, but require an existential solution which is simply to make a decision. I was thinking of nuclear war. Statisticians have figured out there is a very high probability we will have a nuclear war if we do not get rid of all weapons. So how do we humans solve this problem. The only viable solution I can think of is for the US, China and Russia to force all countries to get rid of nuclear weapons. But there are probably many variations of this idea, but all existential in nature. Liberals would necessarily fight over the different ideas. Right wingers would have no idea what anyone was even talking about. I would feel sorry for them, if there ignorance was not so dangerous.