SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Altaba Inc. (formerly Yahoo) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2284)10/31/1997 5:45:00 PM
From: Robert Sievers  Respond to of 27307
 
I am short 500 shares at $43. This stock is right out of Weinstein's book on breakdown stage 4 stocks. The only trick to YHOO was not pulling the trigger to early.

I challange any YHOO bull out there to find a stock with a bigger Price/Sales ratio.

Oh, and I assume I am not the only one that doesn't bother to even look at ad banners. I go to YAHOO every day. Who advertises there anyway?



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2284)10/31/1997 6:06:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27307
 
>>You're also forgetting to mention that AOL has about 10 million *paying* subscribers.

They pay a big chunk of subscriber revenue to WorldCom because WorldCom owns their network now, but AOL has to handle the other associated costs like customer support, billing, etc.

I'm not down on AOL, BTW. I think it's a terrific stock here in the 70's.

>>By the way, AOL competes with Yahoo in the "intenet land grab" (whatever that means).

I know that. AOL legitimatized the Internet advertising industry. AOL and Yahoo are # 1 & 2 in revenues. I didn't invent the "land-grab" phrase; Mary Meeker at Morgan Stanley (whom you should follow) did.

>>Total Yahoo operating earnings for the last 6 quarters = $200,000

That's impressive spin. Do you invest in the rear-view mirror? Wall Street doesn't.

>>Current market cap = $2.2 billion

Isn't America great?

>>then why didn't they offer any cash for 411? Seems to me that if they really had the shareholders' best interest at heart - they would have used some of that cash they have sitting there doing nothing, instead of diluting the float.

Yahoo stock is terrific currency (Just ask my wife). The owners of 411 had no problem taking it. Why don't you look at it that way? 411 is a solid franchise. Who says the transaction isn't accretive? 411 is fertile advertising ground.