SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (527678)11/10/2009 7:19:05 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574692
 
>> That isn't true. I think it is likely, but it can't be proven.

Of course it is. It WAS proven, at least sufficiently that any court of law would find it compelling. Aside from every expert on the subject who reviewed the document finding it to be bogus, there were clear indications that any non-expert like you or me could discern. For example, the fact that it was proportionately spaced at a time when proportionally spaced typewriters were exceedingly rare and generally not in use in the given environment.

Document examiners found extremely compelling evidence the documents were faked and to the extent ANY document can be proven to be fake, these were. If you want to make the argument that NO document can ever be proven fake, then fine, nothing is 100%.



To: combjelly who wrote (527678)11/11/2009 4:40:54 AM
From: Joe NYC1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574692
 
cj,

Your memory is faulty. All I did was point out that most of the reasons given for "proving" the documents were fabricated didn't hold water.

Yeah, like there was equipment on the face of the earth in 1970s that could have created that document, therefore you "refuted". Never mind the that the entire US military may not have been in possession of this equipment....