SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (186507)11/11/2009 3:31:59 AM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 225578
 
It has become obvious liberals use that kind of tactic to avoid answering questions. I've seen Barney Frank use it three times already this week. I've learned a lesson, and I hope others have too. When someone questions your motives, change the subject by feigning indignation and frame the answer around your shock at being personally attacked.

Works every time.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (186507)11/11/2009 3:15:38 PM
From: KLP2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 225578
 
Good article....Isn't it odd how this particular group of people in power today don't want to discuss anything and most especially NOT the things that they KNOW will cost the taxpayers money??

No, they would much rather that we just shut up, and believe anything they tell us. Since when have we had an HONEST series of discussions about the pros and cons of anything to do with anything?

What IS climate change? Why does anyone think that mere man could do to change jet streams? Or to make sun spots disappear? How many millions of years have these things been happening? What events caused these same things to happen millions of years ago?

ETC ETC ETC

WHY NOT have discussions about these things, and headed by the very best 20 top scientists in these fields on BOTH sides of the issues....

WHY NOT discuss these things openly? Are they afraid? Of what? And if so, WHY?