Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (528062)	11/11/2009 4:38:44 PM
From: jlallen	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576803

You'll have to excuse rejek, he hasn't got a clue....

To: Joe NYC who wrote (528062)	11/12/2009 1:35:57 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576803

STFU, hypocrite. Had you complained when Bush was president I would be willing to acknowledge what you say now even as its mostly tripe. But you didn't complain once about Bush's spendthrift ways. In fact, you voted for him twice. Sorry, dude, you have no credibility in this matter. Maybe you were not reading my posts correctly. I did complain and was disillusioned about excessive spending under Bush. Where did you voiced that complaint? Complaining in your head doesn't count. But, in retrospect, in comparison to Obama, Bush looks like a model of fiscal responsibility. First, roughly half of the deficit this year is due to tarp under Bush. As for Obama's stimulative spending, it was necessary. I know you all have a problem with that concept and don't believe the world was nearing economic collapse but that was the case and stimulative spending was a necessity. Frankly, I am tired of arguing the obvious with you all. As for Obama he is a 100 times more fiscally responsible than Bush.