SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (81678)11/11/2009 7:39:17 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
<Instead of playing dodge ball why not just address the issue??>

I think he's dancing around making a "scientific case" where
1.) there is none (that I've seen).
2.) he probably doesn't know enough science (at least from his lack of discussion)... like "Greg or e" most of his info probably comes off wacko websites and when shown patently false, he runs back to try and figure it out.
3.) He likes to claim "tilt" whenever possible by involking "logical fallacy" claims as to 'structure of argument' as soon as sleding gets tough.

The typical argument that aborting a fertilized egg is "murder" by religious leaders is that it has a 'soul'. He should stick to that.

DAK



To: Solon who wrote (81678)12/30/2009 7:32:08 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Instead of playing dodge ball why not just address the issue?

I did address the issue, that was under discussion.

Now I'll address the new issue you bought up as if it was the old one.

If the fertilized egg has human rights, then conspiring to terminate that life ought to subject the mother and the entire team of doctors, nurses, support staff, etc. to criminal consequences

Yes.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News