Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (20610)	11/12/2009 10:29:24 AM
From: brit2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 233807

Both TAS and HAT halted! Brit

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (20610)	11/12/2009 10:42:16 AM
From: ogi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 233807

Yes Claude you have in the past correctly pointed out that TAS had strong advantages in playing Hat's Roughrider deposit, although I think Hat will begin to get credit for other properties at some point.. GWY behaves very well and sometimes that is as important or more important in speculation than the underlying fundamentals, which you correctly note are ahead of themselves with GWY. GSL/VEN play as hot in the sector as anything is, GWY on strike with known high grade on the property and GWY cashed up for a drill program to start within a month. Any gold in those cores and GWY will advance strongly IMO. It is absolutely a spec play rather than any calculation of value vs market cap. One additional fa for them though though is drilling on their coal JV with Xstrata should also be underway about now. I am equally weighted on EAS and GWY right now. EAS will IMO continue to define an excellent resource there.

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (20610)	11/12/2009 11:09:11 AM
From: UPTICK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 233807

My understanding after meeting the TAS VP of buss. development at the Montreal Conf. last week is that TAS holds; 1) 10% of Midwest 2) 51% of NUS claim in Northwest Territories, and 100% of 25000 acres around NSU prop.( Those prop. are 90 km from the old Lupin gold mine,and NSU works them...) 3) a U prop. in Québec Lac Kachwiss,whith 5670000 pds U3O8 at very low grade 4) 10% in Titan EXP. which has 310000 acres in the Athabasca bassin... 5) ...and....2% NSR in 10 other prop. in the Atha. bassin near Wheeler River ... All that to say they that they have an FNV's type of approach that will pay in the long run...FWIW.

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (20610)	11/12/2009 3:37:07 PM
From: Amark$p	Respond to of 233807

Added to EAS today...

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (20610)	11/12/2009 5:38:39 PM
From: SwampDogg	3 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 233807

These companies that have nothing put property near somebody else have been the easiest way to lose money in the resource market since the beginning of time. They have nothing and until they do buying them is a sure way to lose money over any length of time. 99.9999999999999% of the time it just doesn't work. There is nothing underneath when the drill misses. Gold in the ground at the right price with a great chance to find more is the only way to survive in the junior market. The rest is casino crap (and worse odds)