Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SwampDogg who wrote (20736)	11/12/2009 5:42:41 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Respond to of 233807

Proximity plays have always been that way. I remember the BRE-X days, some were 80 miles from BRE-X and they still ran up on hype.

To: SwampDogg who wrote (20736)	11/12/2009 7:23:06 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 233807

In general, I agree with what you say. But there are exceptions as always. Prime examples are Lakeshore and San Gold who are finding more gold nearby (a few km away) operating mines. Such could be the case with GWY.

To: SwampDogg who wrote (20736)	11/12/2009 7:23:53 PM
From: LoneClone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 233807

Although Galway's gold property in Colombia remains a speculation, I would not consign it to that heap. There are a number of artisanal mines on their property, so we know the gold is there, and it is on trend from the discoveries. The remaining questions are how much gold is there, and in what form. And if I am allowed to remain speculative, who will buy out Greystar's, Ventana's, and Galway's properties, and how much will they pay? Edit: yeah, what Ogi said! LC