To: chartseer who wrote (75153 ) 11/13/2009 5:01:03 AM From: Hope Praytochange Respond to of 224749 > The Coming Climate Dictatorship > Posted 07:43 PM ET > > > Control: The House and Senate climate bills contain a provision giving the > president extraordinary powers in the event of a "climate emergency." As > chief of staff Rahm Emanuel says, a crisis is a terrible thing to waste. > > If you thought the House health care bill that nobody read has hidden > passages that threaten our freedoms and liberty, take a peak at the > "trigger" placed in the byzantine innards of both the House-passed > Waxman-Markey bill and the Kerry-Boxer bill just passed by Democrats out > of Sen. Barbara Boxer's Environment and Public Works Committee. > > As Nick Loris of the Heritage Foundation points out, the Kerry-Boxer bill > requires the declaration of a "climate emergency" if the concentration of > carbon dioxide and other declared greenhouse gases in the atmosphere > exceeds 450 parts per million (ppm). It was at about 286 ppm before the > Industrial Revolution and now sits at around 368 ppm. > > That figure was picked out of a hat because the warm-mongers believe > that's the level at which the polar ice caps will disappear, boats can be > moored on the Statue of Liberty's torch and dead polar bears will wash up > on the beaches of Malibu. > > The Senate version includes a section that gives the president authority, > under this declared "climate emergency," to "direct all Federal agencies > to use existing statutory authority to take appropriate actions ... to > address shortfalls" in achieving greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions. > > What the "appropriate actions" might be are not defined and presumably > left up to the discretion of the White House. Could the burning of coal be > suspended or recreational driving be banned? Sen. David Vitter, R-La., > asked the EPA for a definition and received no response. > > Competitive Enterprise Institute scholar Chris Horner says "this agenda > transparently is not about GHG concentrations, or the climate. It's about > what the provision would bring: almost limitless power over private > economic activity and individual liberty for the activist president and, > for the reluctant leader, litigious greens and courts" packed by liberal > Democrat appointees. > > Writing in the Financial Times recently, Czech President Vaclav Klaus, > author of the book, "Blue Planet, Green Shackles," said: "As someone who > lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to say that I > see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and > prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism, not communism." > > Klaus, who has challenged Al Gore to a debate and has rejected Europe's > embrace of Kyoto, told the Cato Institute recently that "environmentalism > is a religion" that accepts global warming on faith and seeks to exploit > it to reshape the world and economic order. > > "Environmentalism only pretends to deal with environmental protection," he > told the libertarian think tank. "Behind the terminology is really an > ambitious attempt to radically reorganize the world." > > The Minnesota Free Market Institute recently hosted an event at Bethel > University in St. Paul, Minn. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, > former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, warned > of one of the consequences of Copenhagen - the loss of American > sovereignty. > > "I read that treaty," Lord Monckton said, "and what it says is this: that > a world government is going to be created. The word 'government' actually > appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second > purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to Third > World countries, (to satisfy) what is called, coyly, 'climate debt' - > because we've been burning CO2 and they haven't." > > This nation was founded and built by those yearning to breathe free. Its > freedoms are imperiled by those demanding that we breathe pure. We are > human sacrifices to the earth goddess Gaia. Loss of sovereignty to both a > federal and a world government and redistribution of wealth on a global > scale - all this in the name of saving the planet from a concocted threat. > > As we have said, the road to Copenhagen is being paved with good > intentions.