SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chartseer who wrote (75153)11/12/2009 8:54:29 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 224749
 
In a nine year span, there were more than 290,000 record high temperatures and more than 140,000 record low temperatures. If those stats don't impress you, you are hopeless.



To: chartseer who wrote (75153)11/13/2009 4:59:53 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224749
 
dailymail.co.uk



To: chartseer who wrote (75153)11/13/2009 5:01:03 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224749
 
> The Coming Climate Dictatorship
> Posted 07:43 PM ET
>
>
> Control: The House and Senate climate bills contain a provision giving the
> president extraordinary powers in the event of a "climate emergency." As
> chief of staff Rahm Emanuel says, a crisis is a terrible thing to waste.
>
> If you thought the House health care bill that nobody read has hidden
> passages that threaten our freedoms and liberty, take a peak at the
> "trigger" placed in the byzantine innards of both the House-passed
> Waxman-Markey bill and the Kerry-Boxer bill just passed by Democrats out
> of Sen. Barbara Boxer's Environment and Public Works Committee.
>
> As Nick Loris of the Heritage Foundation points out, the Kerry-Boxer bill
> requires the declaration of a "climate emergency" if the concentration of
> carbon dioxide and other declared greenhouse gases in the atmosphere
> exceeds 450 parts per million (ppm). It was at about 286 ppm before the
> Industrial Revolution and now sits at around 368 ppm.
>
> That figure was picked out of a hat because the warm-mongers believe
> that's the level at which the polar ice caps will disappear, boats can be
> moored on the Statue of Liberty's torch and dead polar bears will wash up
> on the beaches of Malibu.
>
> The Senate version includes a section that gives the president authority,
> under this declared "climate emergency," to "direct all Federal agencies
> to use existing statutory authority to take appropriate actions ... to
> address shortfalls" in achieving greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions.
>
> What the "appropriate actions" might be are not defined and presumably
> left up to the discretion of the White House. Could the burning of coal be
> suspended or recreational driving be banned? Sen. David Vitter, R-La.,
> asked the EPA for a definition and received no response.
>
> Competitive Enterprise Institute scholar Chris Horner says "this agenda
> transparently is not about GHG concentrations, or the climate. It's about
> what the provision would bring: almost limitless power over private
> economic activity and individual liberty for the activist president and,
> for the reluctant leader, litigious greens and courts" packed by liberal
> Democrat appointees.
>
> Writing in the Financial Times recently, Czech President Vaclav Klaus,
> author of the book, "Blue Planet, Green Shackles," said: "As someone who
> lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to say that I
> see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and
> prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism, not communism."
>
> Klaus, who has challenged Al Gore to a debate and has rejected Europe's
> embrace of Kyoto, told the Cato Institute recently that "environmentalism
> is a religion" that accepts global warming on faith and seeks to exploit
> it to reshape the world and economic order.
>
> "Environmentalism only pretends to deal with environmental protection," he
> told the libertarian think tank. "Behind the terminology is really an
> ambitious attempt to radically reorganize the world."
>
> The Minnesota Free Market Institute recently hosted an event at Bethel
> University in St. Paul, Minn. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton,
> former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, warned
> of one of the consequences of Copenhagen - the loss of American
> sovereignty.
>
> "I read that treaty," Lord Monckton said, "and what it says is this: that
> a world government is going to be created. The word 'government' actually
> appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second
> purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to Third
> World countries, (to satisfy) what is called, coyly, 'climate debt' -
> because we've been burning CO2 and they haven't."
>
> This nation was founded and built by those yearning to breathe free. Its
> freedoms are imperiled by those demanding that we breathe pure. We are
> human sacrifices to the earth goddess Gaia. Loss of sovereignty to both a
> federal and a world government and redistribution of wealth on a global
> scale - all this in the name of saving the planet from a concocted threat.
>
> As we have said, the road to Copenhagen is being paved with good
> intentions.



To: chartseer who wrote (75153)11/13/2009 12:12:09 PM
From: chartseer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224749
 
Oh bummer! Thats me hopeless. Throw another log on the fire and be sure to keep well supplied with firewood for the coming winters.
That whole stat is worthless. 290000 vs 149000. What crap! You loons must be getting desperate. Excuse me for using the plural loons. I had forgotten you are the only Global Warming loon left. Even the almighty Algore has moved on to Climate Crisis. What ever the hell that means. Get your carbon credits early before they run out. What's that they will never run out.

The Hopeless
comrade chartseer