Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : GDXJ - Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Roads End who wrote (104)	11/13/2009 1:38:12 PM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 196

It's also my policy to dump a stock the minute I think there is some serious fudging on the part of management. The issue is still a bit up in the air to me so I am not dumping...yet.

To: Roads End who wrote (104)	11/13/2009 1:43:05 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196

wow, by those standards, what miners would you hold? ng

To: Roads End who wrote (104)	11/13/2009 4:15:21 PM
From: orkrious	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196

I walked away from NGD after the bounce this AM. If management couldn't be fully transparent with 1/3 of the entire production at stake I'm not willing to trust them with what may be hiding behind the other 2/3. I don't understand what everyone is talking about. Management talked about this issue in their CC and they put out a PR a week or two if my memory is correct. I don't thing management hid anything. If one's reason for selling is that some biased judge made a new ruling or an environmental group chose to promote its cause is one thing, but I'm not blaming management. If you are concerned about the risk in the above paragraph there aren't any true miners you can own.