Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (81748)	11/13/2009 6:54:22 PM
From: Solon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"The size of his penis is not really relevant." Judging by his "argument" I believe it is very relevant! The fact that the fertilized egg is human dna has nothing to do with any argument for person-hood and RIGHTS which is the ONLY argument relevant to the issue. Human dna is not contested by anyone. So the video is nothing but TRASH!

To: Greg or e who wrote (81748)	11/14/2009 9:37:02 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

< Not the the material is Human material but that The fetus is a Human being.> And you continue with knocking over 'straw men' ... you aren't claiming only a 'fetus' is human... you are claiming a "fertilized egg" is a human being!! thefreedictionary.com <<a member of any of the races of Homo sapiens; person; man, woman, or child>> Huhh, no fertilized egg there!! newworldencyclopedia.org Huh... none there! Nor here: en.wikipedia.org Damn, where's that fertilized egg Greg??? Greg, why do we always have to get out the dictionary to show you what things mean? Are you that lame? DAK