SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sea Otter who wrote (180369)11/14/2009 3:09:51 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362386
 
Fenwick & West's Silicon Valley Venture Capital Survey Reveals Increase in Valuations in Third Quarter of 2009

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., Nov. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- Fenwick & West LLP, one of the nation's premier law firms providing comprehensive legal services to high technology and life science clients, today announced results of its Third Quarter 2009 Silicon Valley Venture Capital Survey.

The survey analyzed the valuations and terms of venture financings for 103 technology and life science companies headquartered in the greater Silicon Valley/San Francisco Bay Area which reported raising capital in the third quarter of 2009.

"During the third quarter, up rounds exceeded down rounds 41% to 36% with 23% flat. This was the first quarter in 2009 in which up rounds exceeded down rounds," said Barry Kramer, a partner in the firm and co-author of the survey.

An up round is one in which the price per share at which a company sells its stock has increased since its prior financing round. Conversely, a down round is one in which the price per share has declined since a company's prior financing round.

The Fenwick & West Venture Capital Barometer(TM) - which measures the change in share price of Silicon Valley companies funded during the quarter compared with the share price of their previous financing round - showed an 11% average price increase for the quarter.

"This was also the first quarter in 2009 in which the Venture Capital Barometer was positive," said Kramer. "When taken together with the increase in up rounds, venture valuations in Silicon Valley appear to be improving."

"The venture financing environment is sending mixed signals," said Michael Patrick, survey co-author and also a partner in the firm. "Although fundraising by venture capitalists, investments by venture capitalists and liquidity for venture backed companies remained at relatively low levels in 3Q09, there is room for optimism as Nasdaq continued to improve, valuations are slowly increasing and anecdotal evidence indicates that the M&A and IPO markets are improving."

Complete results of the survey with related discussion are posted on Fenwick & West's website at fenwick.com.



To: Sea Otter who wrote (180369)11/14/2009 12:27:01 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362386
 
We knew this population bomb was coming 40 years ago; and the attendant pollution. Add to that the new technological ability to build a world like the Jetsons, we will need more resources than we have.

Today they could build a tunnel through Mount Everest if they wanted.

I think the 800 lb gorilla no one talks about is the realignment of economic parity between east and west. The US has been about 4% of the worlds population consuming 25% of resources. Europe a little less.

Asia is now in the position to change that ratio and that necessarily means western nations will need to live on less. Bush helped that along greatly by his profligate borrowing.

In a way I don't care, as Bush's economic irresponsibility allowed millions of the abject poor in the 3rd world to eat and live better lives.

The last concept no one ever talks about is that everyone in the world cannot be a millionair. Not enough resources and the earth could not stand the pollution. Can't stand it now.

Science has shown humans are not very good at probability. I think that extends to conceptualization e.g. not understanding earths limited resources.



To: Sea Otter who wrote (180369)11/15/2009 5:14:53 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362386
 
Overseas, Obama gives people hope
_____________________________________________________________

BY MITCH ALBOM
DETROIT FREE PRESS COLUMNIST
Nov. 15, 2009

The question came not once but many times during a trip this past week to Ireland and England. From friends. From journalists. Even cab drivers.

"How do you think Obama is doing?'

It was not asked the way we might ask it here, in an evaluative way -- Do you like him? Do you not like him? How do you think he's doing? -- but rather in an almost hopeful tone, the way one mother might ask another mother about her son's progress in a new school. How do you think he's doing? The desired answer, you could tell, was, "Wonderful."

So it seems that, one year after his election, Barack Obama still remains an ideal in places overseas, including the parts I visited. I was amazed at the uniformity of the admiration for the man, as if it were something any sane person would agree on, no different than saying Shakespeare was a good writer or Mother Teresa had a good heart.

With each inquiry, I tried to explain that, to the majority of Americans, Obama is a president, that we didn't elect him because of his skin color, that we didn't elect him as a symbol, that we elected him because we wanted a change and because the majority of the country felt he was the best candidate to do it.

A shining light for the world
But just as a pebble, when thrown in a pond, creates ripples larger than itself, so, too, in parts of the world, does Obama ripple larger than his daily splash in the American spotlight.

The Irish and British attitudes I observed were almost defensive. Some were surprised, for example, that I had been at all critical of Obama's getting the Nobel Peace Prize. When I tried to explain that I would rather see him get it two years from now -- which would mean there would be tangible change to measure -- they seemed disappointed that I didn't think tangible change already had transpired.

And upon thinking about it, although I was bothered at first by the nature of their questions (after all, I said, average Americans don't need a symbol, we need someone to get our budget in line, to put people to work, to ensure our military is both strong and safe, to get the Senate and the Congress to work together), upon further reflection, I think I see a positive in all this.

And here is the positive.

Despite the bashing the United States takes in many corners of the world, it clearly remains a country of inspiration unlike any other. People still look to America to pave the way. To set the tone. To show that what seems impossible in some places -- democracy, peace, prosperity -- is very real between our shores.

Most U.S. citizens couldn't care less about who governs Italy, Norway, Nigeria or, for that matter, the United Kingdom.

But who governs America matters to a lot of people.

An opportunity to lead
I think this makes us unique. The world wants to believe in us. It waits anxiously for an American compass turn. Sure, this may decrease as our economy gets overshadowed by places like China, but ideologically, no one is looking to China with anything more than fear.

America they look at with hope.

It doesn't mean Obama should live in that atmosphere. His job is to do for his people, to serve them and their needs, not his legend or a global coronation. It is why we can and should scrutinize him as much as any president; to do less would be to suggest that somehow his history and ethnicity gave him a free pass.

No free passes. Not in our eyes. And there shouldn't be one in foreigners' eyes. But it is the beauty of the American ideal that countries much older look our way for inspiration. So when they want to know how he's doing, I say he's doing the best he can and time will tell.

And I do thank them for asking. Because in a certain way, as an American, the question is a compliment.
______________

Contact MITCH ALBOM: 313-223-4581 or malbom@freepress.com. Catch "The Mitch Albom Show" 5-7 p.m. weekdays on WJR-AM (760).



To: Sea Otter who wrote (180369)11/17/2009 9:37:13 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362386
 
CNBC Video: Venture Capital: Signs of Strength

cnbc.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (180369)11/18/2009 7:06:51 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362386
 
Silicon Valley Firm Raises Big Fund for Mix of Deals
_______________________________________________________________

By CLAIRE CAIN MILLER
The New York Times
November 18, 2009

Norwest Venture Partners has raised $1.2 billion for a new venture capital fund, an optimistic sign for technology start-ups.

Norwest, which announced its new fund Wednesday, said it would use the fund in part to finance large investments in mature companies, which are typically not a focus of venture capitalists. This strategy, shared by some other firms, has provoked debate over the nature of venture finance.

The new Norwest fund, almost double the size of its last fund and one of the largest to be raised in recent years, provides more evidence of Silicon Valley’s newfound optimism, which has been fueled by recent sales and public offerings of venture-backed start-ups.

Two of those came from Norwest’s portfolio: the $405 million sale of the videoconferencing start-up LifeSize Communications to Logitech this month and the public offering of Rackspace Hosting, a Web hosting company, last year.

“I know there’s a lot of doom and gloom out there, but I believe it’s a little bit more exaggerated than it really is,” said Promod Haque, a managing partner at Norwest, which has long been a presence in Silicon Valley. “There are still good companies that are getting created.”

For the last several years, Norwest has focused on young companies, including Internet start-ups and those that sell complex hardware and software systems to businesses and help them use it. It has also started investing in India, Israel and China.

With its new fund, the firm will start investing in other types of companies, including those that use technology to provide services in health care, education and finance. It will also make more growth equity investments, generally from $25 million to $50 million, in mature companies. These deals will not be limited to technology companies. In India, for example, Norwest is looking at companies that operate power plants and toll roads, and it has invested $53 million in the National Stock Exchange of India.

With this strategy, Norwest joins several other firms that have transformed themselves to look less like traditional venture firms, which typically bet several million dollars on very young start-ups. These firms raise huge funds and invest in start-ups alongside big companies. They include Sequoia Capital, Accel and NEA, which raised a $2.5 billion fund this quarter.

Late-stage investments let investors cash out earlier than with start-ups, which can take a decade to mature. The billion-dollar funds that make these investments are attractive to big pension funds and endowments, which prefer to invest large chunks of money.

Some skeptics say these investments are more about financial engineering of the kind that investment bankers excel at and less about the company creation that Silicon Valley is known for. “Many of the big, multistage firms aren’t really venture firms in the classic sense anymore,” said Chris Douvos, co-head of private equity investing at the Investment Fund for Foundations. The deals they do “may be good risk-adjusted bets, but are a far cry from the de novo innovation that people look for in venture,” he said.

Another group of venture capital firms takes the opposite approach, raising smaller funds and investing small amounts in very young companies. This group includes Union Square Ventures and Greycroft Partners.

“Our biggest challenge today is to think smaller for venture capital,” said Alan Patricof, a veteran venture capitalist who founded Greycroft.

That might work for some Web investments, Mr. Haque said, but it is the exception rather than the rule. Expanding big, long-term, influential companies in other sectors, like semiconductors, networking and wireless, requires more money throughout the company’s life, he said.

“The Ciscos and Oracles and I.B.M.’s don’t take $4 million,” he said. “That’s wishful thinking.”

Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company



To: Sea Otter who wrote (180369)11/18/2009 7:13:40 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362386
 
Fortinet IPO Prices Above Range
____________________________________________________________

November 18th, 2009 - NEW YORK (Reuters) - Network security provider Fortinet Inc, whose products integrate firewalls, Web-filtering and spam-filtering, priced shares in its initial public offering above expectations on Tuesday, in the latest sign of the return of venture capital-backed deals.

The 12.5 million shares priced at $12.50 according to an underwriter, who declined to be identified, and the IPO raised about $156.3 million. Fortinet had expected shares to price between $9 and $11, according to a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

So far this year there have been 10 venture capital-backed IPOs valued at a combined $1.4 billion. There were only six VC-backed IPOs in 2008, totaling $470.2 million, according to Thomson Reuters data.

Silicon Valley-based Fortinet on Monday raised the number of shares it planned to sell to 12.5 million from 12 million on strong interest from investors, with the additional shares all being offered by the selling stockholders who offered 6.7 million shares rather than 6.2 million.

The company’s executives and directors are selling 2.4 million shares while venture backers Redpoint Ventures and Meritech Capital are offering a combined 1.5 million shares in the offering.

Fortinet will raise more than $50 million, which it has said it will use for working capital, developing new products and potential acquisitions, among other things.

Fortinet had sales of $181.4 million in the first nine months of 2009, up 18.8 percent over a year earlier, with a profit of $16.2 million.

The IPO’s lead underwriters are Morgan Stanley (MS.N), J.P. Morgan Securities & Co (JPM.N) and Deutsche Bank Securities (DBKGn.DE). They have the option to buy an additional 1.875 million shares.

Fortinet will debut on the Nasdaq on Wednesday under the ticker “FTNT.” (Reporting by Clare Baldwin and Phil Wahba; Editing by Gary Hill)



To: Sea Otter who wrote (180369)11/18/2009 5:04:27 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362386
 
If A Google Phone Actually Exists, It's A Mistake (GOOG)

businessinsider.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (180369)11/18/2009 7:15:37 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362386
 
Private-Equity Funding Plunges 62% at Calpers Amid Fee Review

By Cristina Alesci, Jonathan Keehner and Jason Kelly

Nov. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The biggest U.S. pension plan doled out 62 percent less cash to buyout companies in the first seven months of the year and pressed for fee cuts as firms, including Apollo Management LP, struggled to revive dealmaking.

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System wrote checks for $2.23 billion to the firms through July, compared with $5.93 billion during the same period last year, according to documents prepared for Calpers’s investment committee meetings. Joseph Dear, Calpers’s chief investment officer, said he may extend his review of the plan’s “relationship” with Leon Black’s Apollo to other private-equity managers.

After contributing to the record $1.2 trillion raised by buyout funds this decade, many pensions, endowments and wealthy families suffered their worst losses last year. Now fund managers face mounting pressure from those investors, known as limited partners, to deploy cash more judiciously and rein in fees that transformed founders of the largest funds, Blackstone Group LP, KKR & Co. LP and Carlyle Group, into billionaires.

“You’re in a period where performance is poor and, particularly for the big guys, it’s coming home to roost,” said Steven Kaplan, who teaches a course on private equity at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. “When performance is poor and money is scarce, the limited partners have the power.”

The investors in a private-equity fund agree to make a set amount of money available over the life of the fund. As the buyout firm makes acquisitions, it requests the cash from the partners to fund their share of each deal. While the firm has the right to call capital as needed, the limited partners may cut commitments to future funds if they disagree with how the firm spends the money.

Apollo Review

Since Dear, 58, was named in January to join Calpers, Apollo requested $94.6 million for investments in the seven months through July, compared with $1.43 billion during the same period last year, according to the Calpers documents.

Calpers has committed more than $4 billion to Apollo, of which $943 million remained untapped by the New York-based firm as of June 30, according to the pension plan’s Web site. The California fund plans to push Apollo to forgo a portion of that and lower its fees, the Wall Street Journal reported Nov. 13.

Private-equity firms typically charge investors a fee equal to 2 percent of assets under management and take 20 percent of all profit they generate.

‘Only Natural’

The review comes as Apollo aims to take advantage of the stock market recovery to boost its market value, according to the Financial Times. The firm, which is currently traded on bank-run platforms such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s GS TrUE, plans to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange in the coming weeks, the FT said, citing unidentified people familiar with the situation.

“We may examine other managers in the same way we are looking at Apollo,” Dear, who oversees investments for 1.6 million state government workers, said in an interview. “Many managers have 2006 and 2007 vintage funds that need restructuring and reworking. It would only be natural for a new chief investment officer to review those relationships.”

Money called by Washington-based Carlyle, the world’s second-largest private-equity company, fell by 55 percent in the first seven months of the year, to $206.5 million, according to the Calpers data.

Record Years

Christopher Ullman, a spokesman for Carlyle, and Steven Anreder, a spokesman for Apollo, declined to comment on the Calpers figures, as did Christine Anderson, a spokeswoman for New York-based Blackstone. Anreder didn’t return calls placed after hours seeking comment on the FT report.

Private-equity managers announced a record $1.6 trillion worth of transactions from 2005 to 2007, before the global credit contraction stalled takeovers and halted sales of companies the firms had prepared for divestment.

Calpers committed $25 billion under Dear’s predecessor, Russell Read, to private-equity funds started in 2006 and 2007, more than four times the amount offered to funds formed in the two previous years. The pension fund posted the worst annual performance since its creation in 1932 in the year ended June 30, as assets dropped by 23 percent. Alternative investments, such as private equity and hedge funds, fell 31 percent.

Profits Shrink

Profits distributed to investors this year have been scarce, even when compared to the smaller capital calls from funds. In Calpers’s case, distributions from fund managers, known as general partners, were $437.5 million for the first seven months of 2009 compared with $2.45 billion for the same period a year earlier.

Private-equity investors have been hit by a combination of factors, including an overall decline in asset values, a lack of distributions from earlier investments and relatively low returns from more recent buyout funds, said University of Chicago’s Kaplan.

“It’s a triple whammy,” Kaplan said.

Private-equity firms still have a total of $400 billion in unspent, committed capital, according to researcher Pitchbook Data Inc. in Seattle. Calpers said its general partners can draw from a pool of $23 billion.

The decline in private-equity contributions is skewed by two factors, Calpers spokesman Brad Pacheco said in an e-mail. A 77 percent drop in dealmaking in the first seven months of the year meant managers had less need for capital. Calpers also agreed to larger-than-average one-time contributions in 2008, he said.

Cutting Commitments

Apollo called about $2 billion last year, according to the Calpers documents, more than Carlyle, TPG and Blackstone combined. The firm in December reached a $1 billion settlement related to the failed $6.5 acquisition of Huntsman Corp. by Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc. Apollo in March agreed to inject $200 million into Hexion.

“Firms could be calling less cash because of pressure from limited partners or because they’re doing fewer deals, and it’s probably a combination of both,” said Pavel Savor, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School in Philadelphia. “Limited partners can threaten to not re-invest with a manager, which is a concern for bigger private-equity firms.”

Dear, who joined Calpers from Washington State on March 2, has cut commitments to new funds to $1.13 billion in the first six months of the year, from $12.2 billion in all of 2008 and its all-time high of $15.9 billion in 2007, according to data on its Web site.

‘Unspent Capital’

“Managers still have plenty of unspent capital to use before we commit new funds,” Calpers’s Pacheco said. Contributions to managers from existing commitments will grow over the year as the rising stock market and a recovery in debt markets fuel new buyouts, he said.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index has rallied 64 percent from its March 9 low. Loan prices as measured by S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index, which tracks the most-actively traded loans, gained a record 46 percent this year after declining an unprecedented 28 percent in 2008. Goldman Sachs last week committed as much as $3.28 billion to finance the purchase of IMS Health Inc. by TPG and the CPP Investment Board.

The $5.2 billion IMS deal, announced Nov. 5, would be the largest leveraged buyout of the year. A group including KKR, based in New York, said Nov. 8 it would pay $1.65 billion for Northrop Grumman Corp.’s government consulting unit. That followed Blackstone’s announcement in October that it plans to buy Anheuser-Busch InBev NV’s theme parks business for as much as $2.7 billion.

Blackstone Deals

“Many of our managers were sitting tight during the volatile periods in the markets,” said Pacheco in an e-mail. “The market is ripe with opportunities now.”

Calpers invested $31.9 million in deals done by Stephen Schwarzman’s Blackstone in the first seven months of the year, a drop of 44 percent. Blackstone President Tony James told reporters on Nov. 6 that investors in funds of the world’s largest private-equity company are encouraging the firm to make deals.

“Limited partners once concerned about new investments are now urging us to put money to work,” James said.

Dear said he is reviewing how, and how much, his pension plan is paying private-equity firms as they start to invest again. Calpers said last month it started a special review of fees investment managers paid to placement agents to win state business.

Apollo Subpoena

Apollo has received subpoenas from authorities investigating the use of so-called “placement agents,” the Financial Times reported, citing a letter Black sent to investors. The subpoenas are from California, New Jersey, New Mexico and New York, and from the Securities and Exchange Commission in New York and Denver, the FT said, citing an unidentified person familiar with the situation.

Calpers, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board and the State of New Jersey Division of Investments have endorsed a set of “Best Practices” aimed at getting better terms when entering into partnership agreements with private-equity firms.

The guidelines, proposed by the Institutional Limited Partners Association, apply to everything from fee structure to ensuring the independence of auditors. The ILPA said management fees should “step down significantly” at the end of an investment period. The extra charges managers sometimes levy, which include transaction, exit and advisory fees, should benefit the fund, not the manager, according to ILPA.

Clawback Provisions

“The document is a starting point, meant to spark discussion between general and limited partners,” said ILPA executive director Kathy Jeramaz-Larson. “The ultimate goal, however, is limited partners getting better returns for their pensioners.”

Investors are also pushing for stronger so-called clawback provisions that would strengthen their ability to recoup money from managers who end up with more than their share of the profits.

‘Improving terms and conditions is part of our strategy as we begin the process of re-upping some managers and selecting new ones,’’ Dear said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Jonathan Keehner in New York at jkeehner@bloomberg.net; Cristina Alesci in New York at Calesci2@bloomberg.net; Jason Kelly in New York at jkelly14@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: November 18, 2009 00:00 EST



To: Sea Otter who wrote (180369)11/18/2009 7:28:57 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362386
 
Norwest Raises $1.2 Billion Venture Fund, Biggest of This Year /

By Tim Mullaney

Nov. 18 (Bloomberg) -- Norwest Venture Partners raised a $1.2 billion venture-capital fund, the biggest to be completed this year, to expand in Israel and India while broadening the range of companies it backs.

The fund, Norwest’s 11th since its founding almost 50 years ago, will give the firm more money to fund larger companies, Managing Partner Promod Haque said in an interview. Norwest has backed more than 450 companies, including software maker PeopleSoft Inc. and social-gaming startup Playdom Inc.

“Some of our initiatives in growth investing and globalization have done pretty well, and we need a larger fund so we can scale them,” said Haque, 61, who emigrated to the U.S. from India in 1972. “It took a little bit of time, but we have a track record.”

Venture fundraising dropped by two-thirds in the first nine months of the year from a year earlier, according to the National Venture Capital Association in Arlington, Virginia. Along with a $575 million fund announced by Greylock Partners this month, Norwest’s new fund shows that venture capital firms with a proven track record can still attract investors, Haque said.

Norwest expanded in India and Israel when it raised a $650 million fund in 2006, Haque said. The Palo Alto, California- based firm has since hired at least seven partners in India and Israel, and plans to expand U.S. investments in medical devices and health-care information technology. It is also investing more money in later-stage companies that once would have gotten capital from public investors, Haque said.

Norwest’s fund bucks an industry trend toward smaller investment pools, advocated by venture capitalists such as Alan Patricof of Greycroft Partners LLC in New York and David Sze at Greylock.

Smaller Funds

Smaller funds can sometimes recover all of their investors’ money with a single bet, while larger funds may need a half- dozen or more hits, Sze said in an interview last month.

Norwest raised more money because its diversification plans are expensive, and larger companies are more capital intensive, Haque said. A slowdown in initial public offerings means the firm will need to support startups for as long as eight or nine years, he said.

“It’s going to take money to get companies to where they can go public or do mergers at a reasonable price,” Haque said.

Norwest’s fund is unlikely to remain the year’s largest. New Enterprise Associates, the industry’s biggest firm by assets under management, has almost completed raising a $2.5 billion fund, according to a regulatory filing from the Chevy Chase, Maryland-based firm last month.

To contact the reporter on this story: Tim Mullaney in New York at tmullaney1@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: November 18, 2009 00:00 EST