SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : CCEE Breaking Out -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gary Green who wrote (7579)10/31/1997 10:17:00 PM
From: Rick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12454
 
LIKE IT OR NOT, YOU'LL HAVE MY IMPUT.*

I do not trust you. I think you are a company plant.

Many times lawyers are hired for "advocacy purposes" which do not involve legal or litigations matters. You have carried that ball to the best of your limited ability. Just as often lawyers are engaged in a manner that requires them to keep the FACT of their representation confidential.

THEREFORE YOU PLACE THE SHAREHOLDERS IN THE POSITION OF THE MAN AT THE FORK IN THE ROAD WITH A MEMBER OF THE TRIBE OF LIARS AND A MEMBER OF THE TRIBE OF TRUTH TELLERS AS GUIDES, HE DOES NOT KNOW WHICH GUIDE BELONGS TO WHICH TRIBE.

IF THEY ASK YOU IF YOU WORK FOR CCEE AND YOU SAY YES YOU MIGHT VIOLATE ONE OF THE CANONS OF ETHICS.(OR NONE BUT HOW DO THEY KNOW?)

IF THEY ASK YOU IF YOU WORK FOR CCEE AND YOU SAY NO YOU MIGHT VIOLATE ANOTHER OF THE CANONS OF ETHICS.(OR NONE BUT HOW DO THEY KNOW?)

YOUR DEMEANOR IS NOT PROFESSIONAL NOR IS YOUR SELF SERVING SOLICITATION HERE ON THIS THREAD. YOU ARE AN EMBARRASSMENT TO AN HONORABLE PROFESSION.

IN FACT WERE YOU NOT THE ONE WHO MADE A BIG POINT ABOUT SHAREHOLDERS COULDN'T SUE COMPANIES ANY MORE?????????

* Keeping in mind at all time during the reading of the above that this is just my personal opinion deliverd after two days without your "daily diagnosis" based upon your, and as an exhibit of your, PROFESSIONAL demeanor.



To: Gary Green who wrote (7579)10/31/1997 11:34:00 PM
From: Stan Price  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12454
 
Gary,

I am leaning in favor of your proposal as it stands because it addresses most of the concerns that I, as a stockholder, have felt since the proxy issue first came up. To suggest that you are a company plant when your proposal in no way is a vote in favor of management is absurd. Definitly a case of "pot calling the kettle black." In fact, any doubts I might have had about sincerity of your proposal were erased when the accusation was made.
Regarding the proposal itself, particularly the fourth item regarding the election of a new totally independant director, Do you feel it would be difficult attracting a quality person for this position given the current lack of credibility this company faces? Would it be possible for the stockholders to present their own candidate for this position? Although I'm not sure of the legalities of it, I have personally known of situations where the management of companies (not penny stocks either) have made "deals" with institutional votes such as promising new independant directors for votes with management on issues the stockholders were opposed to. To me this indicates that "deals" can indeed be struck with people or institutions with positions that would make a difference in the voting.
I am not sure about the necessity of the votes being channeled through your firm except for the purpose of showing management a unified front. I would certainly not be opposed to this process if the others here WITH VOTING SHARES see it as a viable option.



To: Gary Green who wrote (7579)11/1/1997 12:32:00 AM
From: Rick  Respond to of 12454
 
I TAKE IT YOU WILL FILE, YOUR PUBLIC SOLICITATION

OF PROXIES HERE, WITH THE SEC ON MONDAY, AND

WE CAN EXPECT TO SEE IT ON EDGAR, ON TUESDAY???



To: Gary Green who wrote (7579)11/1/1997 1:48:00 AM
From: BANCHEE  Respond to of 12454
 
Well,well,It's about #%@! time
I've been sitting here everyday reading all this
crap that's been going on. If you want to get somthing
going, I'm 110% for it.BUT two things must happen

1- RICK you gotta call GARY.You have been posting
all the time that people should do things.
WELL NOW IT'S YOUR TURN. CALL him,talk to him.
See if you can trust him.Go with your gut feelings.

2-GARY, YOU GOTTA do the same.Work things out between
you two.Stop all the BS you two have going on.

We have a lot of intelligent people on this thread
and I'm sure that they will help.Maybe we need to get
everyone on this thread to call or E mail to get an
idea of what we have in strenght.(LURKERS INCLUDED)

COME ON PUGS,SAL,DORINE,DONNA,STEVE,SCOTT,TOM,
SEAN,FRED,GEORGE,DR.MOZE,STAN AND EVERYONE ELSE.
WHAT DO YOU SAY???????????????

BANCHEE

PS GARY I WILL CALL YOU ON MONDAY.