Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (81783)	11/16/2009 3:38:42 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"You're pretending that the mother isn't involved..." That's silly! In the case of human cloning the only involvement on the part of the mother is to initially produce the egg. Do you believe otherwise? "ANY embryologist knows this." You never quote any embryologists, you just quote wiki/flunky and tricki/dici. If you did quote an embryology textbook (as I have done repeatedly), you would no doubt follow your now, well worn path, and do so out of context, but go ahead and do it. "once you bring THE MOTHER in, vs clone, then the context changes." Like is said the context in this case is cloning. It is very interesting to note however that the ones arguing for Human experimentation are arguing that the Zygote does not become a Human Being until implantation which clearly indicates that they believe that an implanted Zygote is a Human being. Your position is damned either way. It's unscientific, unethical, and illogical.