Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (530180)	11/18/2009 10:33:05 AM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576885

Two things. Why don't you convert that to Farenheit from Kelvin. Because one degree Kelvin is one degree Fahrenheit! No need to convert. Second, you are ignoring how processes really work. Actually that is no different than what the pro warming scientists do. Though some of the first have recanted and claim their first efforts were in error. The reality is that most scientists don't have any doubts about global warming and that it will have catastrophic consequences for us in the next 100 years. Wrong, recent polling has shown that this is in error. The IIPC is claiming scientists that signed on their study agree. When actually the signatures only mean that they take credit on working on parts of it. Even so, many who did agree with the global warming theories no longer do. Despite where you fall on that belief though, there should be no debate about the reality that oil independence for the US is a very good thing for our economy and national security. Deny that and you will show your true colors for all to see. Do you deny it? Of course, which is why we should drill for more oil as well as develop solar, nuclear, and wind energy. All energy types are good.