SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (530392)11/18/2009 7:56:32 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578163
 
Al, > You did read the article I posted in which the timeline shows that the supreme court changed the rules of a military tribunal.

Not exactly. The Supreme Court didn't change the rules. They just told the Bush administration that the version of a Senate bill in 2005 was unconstitutional. After that, a lot of drafting and negotiations took place between Congress and the White House, which led to the new rules Obama adopted earlier this year.

But the new rules essentially made the military tribunal option unviable. Either way, the Justice Department was steered this way by a complicated set of rulings and laws.

Tenchusatsu



To: Alighieri who wrote (530392)11/18/2009 8:00:35 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578163
 
That would suggest that the AG is the vassal of the president...this guy shows no such penchant.

Don't be ridiculous.

These are two peas in a pod when it comes to extremist liberal philosophy toward our legal system.

They BOTH wanted to give terrorists the benefit of the doubt and give them every opportunity speak out against America. That is, after all, the MO for this sleazy WH. Bash America. Harsly and frequently.