Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (530578)	11/19/2009 9:39:40 AM
From: jlallen	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575348

The audience she is playing to doesn't care about policy. What nonsense you post....how did you get to be such a dumb fukk?

To: combjelly who wrote (530578)	11/19/2009 10:37:51 AM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575348

"The audience she is playing to doesn't care about policy. So she doesn't have to." sexist and racist, typical liberal.

To: combjelly who wrote (530578)	11/19/2009 5:32:45 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575348

"What's amazed me is that she is no more articulate when it comes to policy issues than she was a year ago." The audience she is playing to doesn't care about policy. So she doesn't have to. She is riding a populist wave. Which comes around every now and then. And we are ripe for one. What isn't clear is whether or not this one will result in actual change. So far, the primary faces of the populists show little inclination of challenging corporations. Which have become a major component of the structures that populists traditionally have gone against. I think the populist movement against corp. is coming but I don't think it will come from her side. After all, its corp. who are supporting the tea baggers. Frankly, I don't think she knows what populism really is.