Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (530639)	11/19/2009 2:31:51 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574626

I already posted proof that there was very little stimulative effect from the Bush tax cuts, but there sure were massive structural deficits as a result, which you won't acknowledge. BTW, in general, I do agree that tax cuts can be a preferred stimulus, but only if we have surpluses from which to give those tax cuts. When we borrow from China to give tax cuts, then I'm 100% against that, unless someone proves to me that the tax cuts are in an area like renewable energy that will drive massive new innovation, new jobs, and a substantial return on investment beyond the cost of the borrowing.