SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (24604)11/22/2009 8:59:54 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™8 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71474
 
i could start with: he's a professional plagerist. and then work my way up the ladder from there.

since it is all borrowed, why would you even mention his name, any more than you'd say reuters reported such and such, which in fact, is what reuters does.

but since i said it, and you asked, there's an answer.

have fun.

i'll be in court on the plaintiff's side, when that day finally comes. and i will pay my own expenses to tell the truth.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (24604)11/23/2009 1:57:37 AM
From: axial3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71474
 
Skeeter, agreed. There are all kinds of voices out there, and Mish is worth listening to. As is Vi.

In the last 2 years, I can't think of anyone who has called everything right, and there have been a lot of really smart people making predictions. This is a crazy market: economic fundamentals stink, and many valuations are out of line.

Every sane person knows there's a huge amount of latent systemic risk out there. Major economies teetering:

Bets rise on rich country bond defaults

ft.com

Société Générale tells clients how to prepare for potential 'global collapse'

telegraph.co.uk

---

No matter what they say, nobody "knows". Probabilities are changing every day. We look for thinking that's a cut above the average, keep our eyes open, and play the market like hunted animals.

Jim




To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (24604)11/23/2009 12:40:23 PM
From: GST13 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 71474
 
Mish is in business -- the business of getting people to pay attention to him. Nothing more and nothing less. He will say and do anything for attention -- that is how he gets paid. Right now he is doing everything he can to pander to people who yearn deep to the core of their souls to believe that the activities of human beings have no impact on climate -- and his little following is sucking it up like coolaid on a hot day. He will not ask the obvious questions -- such as which cast of characters has gone to such extraordinary lengths to target climate change science on the eve of a major political meeting on climate change -- because that will run counter to the base of his 'followers'. This smacks of a conspiracy all right -- but not a conspiracy of scientists. Perhaps if I had hundreds of billions of dollars to lose from the end of oil I too might use CIA like tactics to convince people that they can safely rely on people like Mish to declare that it was all just a hoax -- go back to sleep sheeple.

Mish is the ultimate wannabe -- a wannabe that can make a living as a wannabe so long as anybody is willing to pay attention to him.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (24604)11/23/2009 12:52:15 PM
From: GST3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71474
 
Want to hide this? news.yahoo.com

It is easy to hide these floating giants -- just spend millions of dollars trolling stolen email and watch out for anything that might look out of place -- the flippant use of the word 'hide' by somebody who plays with data for a living -- oh, there, now I have done it myself, I said 'plays with data' -- now what more do you need to be certain that these floating giants do not exist -- he said 'hide' and I said 'plays with data'. Case closed, there is no human impact on climate. And you wonder why people think anti-climate-change politcal types are idiots.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (24604)11/23/2009 5:01:42 PM
From: axial  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71474
 
"I am genuinely not sure what happens next. Having narrowly avoided a Great Depression by using massive fiscal and monetary stimulus, we are now in uncharted waters.

Does the recovery we've seen in fits and starts have any legs at all, outside of the major emerging markets? Or is it a mirage?

I don't think it's possible to infer from the stock market rally anything resembling a sustained recovery. The third quarter GDP number of 3.5% growth was at least half due to one-off government measures. In any case, the U.S. consumer is constrained by horrible balance sheet problems – excessive leverage and severely reduced real estate values on the assets side. The stock market rally has been largely due to near-zero interest rates and a weaker dollar. In foreign currency terms there's been no rally."

---

Why Niall Ferguson is still bearish

theglobeandmail.com

Jim



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (24604)11/23/2009 10:24:25 PM
From: Real Man  Respond to of 71474
 
Yes, the idea of a funding crisis seems foreign to him, which
is why I am happily banned from his thread.

This was a nice fade. Not that Jim is always right either,
but he is definitely not an alien to the idea of manipulation, as many gold bugs. -g-

globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com