Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (229913)	11/23/2009 12:59:16 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

I agree on Iraq, Afghanistan is more difficult. What would you have had Bush do after 9/11? I supported his going in there, but I also feared there was no easy exit. Its proving to be the case. No, I'm not in the medical field. I simply think that competitive systems end up being superior to non-competitve systems. The fundamental flaw currently with insurance is the preexisting condition problem. But the flip side is that everyone must be insured at all times. How lower income individuals pay is a separate matter which is best dealt with in the same way we deal with all other such issues. It is wealth transfer, like it or not. Separate the issues, and deal with each in the best manner we can, rather than lumping them together and getting a poorer solution.