Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (532070)	11/23/2009 7:40:44 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1574577

CJ, > I think y'all vastly overestimate the costs and intake of documentaries. Maybe. It's not like the G.I.Joe movie ... Tenchusatsu

To: combjelly who wrote (532070)	11/23/2009 8:17:50 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574577

>>> For documentaries, it puts it in the top 10 so far. >>> I think y'all vastly overestimate the costs and intake of documentaries. I don't. They almost always lose money, but they don't usually cost much to make. Having seen one of Moore's films I generally would not watch another. But, documentaries are of interest to me generally because of the annual festival here. What is truly gratifying is to see Michael Moore fall flat. And the irony is just stunning -- Fat-assed filthy-rich SOB makes a movie bashing people over health care. Fat-assed, filthy rich SOB capitalist makes movie bashing capitalism only to watch it fall TOTALLY FLAT, AND PEOPLE HATE IT. Could it get any better? Not having seen it I don't have any idea if it was expensive to make. But is is great to see the usual liberal suckers haven't lined up to pay the sorry anti-American bastard to see it. Nothing would please me more than to see him in a soup line some day. To call this bum's movies "documentaries" is a big lie to begin with.