Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (125458)	11/23/2009 9:53:54 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542214

This is way above my pay grade to understand. But I just think people like Paul Krugman, Dean Baker, James Kwak, etc may know stuff I don't. Robert Samuelson Asks Whether Creatures from Neptune Will Storm the Planet Yes, with the unemployment rate about to hit 10 percent, Robert Samuelson yet again expresses concern over the country's biggest problem: the prospect of defaulting on its debt. Never mind that investors are prepared to hold U.S. government bonds for an interest rate of just 3.5 percent -- the lowest rate (except for earlier in this crisis) in almost 60 years. There is still nothing more important for Post readers to hear about than the risk that the U.S. government will default on its debt. Who knows, maybe if the Post and other media outlets run enough pieces touting this risk they may even be able to scare some investors and affect the markets, even if their efforts thus far have failed. It's too bad that the Post could not have been troubled to talk about the $8 trillion housing bubble before it burst. Given the huge additional to the debt that resulted from the collapse of the bubble, which was entirely predictable, anyone who was really concerned about the debt would have filled their pages with talk of the housing bubble in the years 2002-2007. But, the Washington Post could find no space for such warnings. Even today, the paper and Robert Samuelson are such determined protectionists that they refuse to even consider the prospect of free trade in health care, a step that would drastically reduce the projections for long-term deficits. Oh well, this is like War of the Worlds, a scare story, not serious policy analysis. --Dean Baker

To: JohnM who wrote (125458)	11/23/2009 9:55:42 PM
From: Steve Lokness	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542214

John; So, he suggests, the timing might be dictated by the fact that federal programs to decrease unemployment are beginning to get traction. Huh? The NYTimes piece? Oh I don't get that at all - but hey, I might have missed something. .......What I get is that Krugman picks data points that he likes and ignores others. He says the market supports his thinking, but what about gold? It's just morally wrong intellectually to pick and choose and Krugman always does that. If he will explain gold and if he will discuss what this debt means in lost opportunity and if he would give some thought and discussion on how to pay it back I would respect him more. steve