Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (532160)	11/24/2009 12:32:43 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574005

Make the case that he is mis-quoting the CBO. But, you have no intention of trying, do you? Because you can't. Of course he was; he was running CBO. But I get really tired of this same argument. I've shown you to be wrong time and again. Now, in the case of the Bush cuts, it is a fact the revenue didn't respond immediately -- which is no surprise given the economic disaster resulting from 9/11. But it eventually did once we had recovered from the Clinton Terrorist Attack of 9/11. But on what basis, exactly, would you argue AGAINST the Bush tax cuts? You cannot credibly argue against them on the basis of deficit reduction, given the doubling or tripling of deficits under Obama and wasteful 800 Billion in porkulus spending. So, what is the point of your argument, exactly?