SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Al Seim who wrote (25442)11/1/1997 3:48:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1580018
 
Al - Re: "BTW, I realize that the problem of the moment is production, not pricing, but this pricing issue has bugged me for months."

AMD's 25% "Less than Intel " pricing started out as 25% less than the Pentium Pro. (The Pentium II wasn't announced at that time).

It didn't sell at that time.

If you recall, no major OEM's announced K6 machines at AMD's K6 launch.

Very quickly, Sanders et., al., retargeted the pricing of the K6 towards the Pentium MMX. They subsequently managed to get DEC and IBM as purchasers of the K6.

I think AMD is just facing a market reality - most K6 PCs sell at a discount to a comparably equipped Intel Pentium MMX machine. The net result for the PC manufacturer is nearly a "wash" - a lower cost CPU but a lower sales price on his end product.

Paul



To: Al Seim who wrote (25442)11/1/1997 6:52:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580018
 
Al and All, <perhaps AMD have to undercut this far to attack a 90% market leader>
In addition to agressive cut in pricing, Intel uses a "reimbursement program" for "Intel inside" advertising:
exchange2000.com
"we reveiw all the ads that are submitted for reimbursement
through the Intel Inside Co-op Ad program. If they don't adhere to the
guidlines then they don't get reimbursed. John Hull, Intel Corp."

Does anyone know how much this would be per Intel's CPU?

Regards,

Ali