Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (23988)	11/1/1997 11:47:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Chuck: I mentioned this once before, but I think it bears repeating. If the shorts really were confident that IPM had nothing, the would not be bombarding this thread with their nonsense. They would be encouraging the stock to rise, so they could short at higher levels in order to make more money when it is shown that IPM doesn't have the goods. No, these tactics indicate the shorts are sweating, and they are pulling out all of the stops. IMO, they have good reason to sweat.

To: go4it who wrote (23988)	11/1/1997 12:26:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Charles, the shorts now play a risky game. Look at the risk/reward. We will get a report, it will be good or bad. The stock has the potential to go to either $30+ or $2 from before the announcement to after the announcement depending on the results. I hope the company sticks it to the shorts for all the grief investors have had to endure. The company can ask for a trading halt before the announcement to have them sweat. That should allow an explosive opening that would clean their clocks, a little justice. Wouldn't it be nice?