SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (11872)11/27/2009 9:23:27 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
The bottom line is that the path that those pushing for the government takeover is a monopsony. They will get it as soon as they can. If they can't get there in this bill there will be another, and another, until we have government as the sole payer for healthcare.

At that point in time the rationing will begin in earnest.

the problem there is the government outlawing other forms of payment.

In many other countries with socialized medicine this is exactly what they have done to deal with doctor shortages. If the best doctors decline to participate because they would like to earn a reasonable compensation rather than a government minimum wage then government takes their services by outlawing their practices.



To: TimF who wrote (11872)11/27/2009 10:30:37 AM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Mammograms are a good thing. The costly part is the work up of findings, which most often turn out to be benign. By the same token great numbers of women get cured, relatively non-invasively, when tumors are found early.

The danger of radiation from mammo's is very small. Remember reading that it was estimated as being the same a from smoking 1/8 of one cigarette.