SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scion who wrote (109262)11/26/2009 11:43:37 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
DEFENDANT SIGNATURE WORLDWIDE ADVISORS, LLC.’S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

11/25/2009 33 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to 1 Complaint with Jury Demand by K & L International Enterprises, Inc., Signature Leisure, Inc., Jared E. Hochstedler, Signature Worldwide Advisors, LLC, Stephen W. Carnes, Lawrence A. Powalisz, Enzyme Enviromental Solutions, Inc..(Slaughter, Harrison) (Entered: 11/25/2009)

Doc 33 PDF file
viewer.zoho.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXHANGE COMMISSION,
Case No. 6:09-cv-1638-GAP-KRS
Plaintiff

v.

K&L INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC.,
SIGNATURE LEISURE, INC., SIGNATURE
WORLDWIDE ADVISORS, LLC, STEPHEN W.
CARNES, LAWRENCE A. POWALISZ,
ENZYME ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
INC. and JARED E. HOCHSTEDLER,
Defendants.
__________________________________________/

DEFENDANT SIGNATURE WORLDWIDE ADVISORS, LLC.’S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Defendant, Signature Worldwide Advisors LLC. (“Signature Worldwide”), by the undersigned counsel, hereby answers and defends the Complaint filed by Plaintiff, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, as follows:

ANSWER

NATURE OF THE CASE

1. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 1 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

2. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 2.

3. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 3 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

4. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 4 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

5. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 5 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6. Signature Worldwide admits the allegations in Paragraph 6.

7. Signature Worldwide admits that Venue lies with this Court, however, Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the remaining allegations, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 7.

DEFENDANTS

8. Signature Worldwide admits the allegations in Paragraph 8.

9. Signature Worldwide admits the allegations in Paragraph 9.

10. Signature Worldwide admits the allegations in Paragraph 10.

11. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 11.

12. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 12.

13. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 13.

14. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 14.

THE ISSUER COMPANIES

15. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 15.

16. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 16.

17. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 17.

FACTS

18. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 18 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

THE REVENGE PROMISSORY NOTES

19. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 19.

20. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 20.

21. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 21.

22. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 22.

23. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 23.

24. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 24.

THE WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS:

AN OVERVIEW

25. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Cross Atlantic, International Power and Enzyme Environmental, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the remaining allegations and the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 25.

26. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 26.

THE CROSS ATLANTIC WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

27. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Cross Atlantic, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to Cross Atlantic, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 27.

28. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Cross Atlantic, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to Cross Atlantic, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 28.

29. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Cross Atlantic, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to Cross Atlantic, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 29.

30. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Cross Atlantic, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to Cross Atlantic, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 30.

THE REVENGE DESIGNS WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

31. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 31.

32. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 32.

33. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 33.

34. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 34.

THE ENZYME ENVIRONMENTAL WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

35. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Enzyme Environmental, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 35.

36. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Enzyme Environmental, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 36.

37. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Enzyme Environmental, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 37.

38. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Enzyme Environmental, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 38.

39. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Enzyme Environmental, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 39.

40. Signature Worldwide admits that it entered into agreements with Enzyme Environmental, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Worldwide further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 40.

THE INTERNATIONAL POWER WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

41. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 41.

42. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 42.

43. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 43.

44. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 44.

COUNT I

DEFENDANTS’ OFFER AND SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 5 (a) AND 5 (c) OF THE SECURITIES ACT

(Against Defendants K&L International Enterprises, Inc., Signature Leisure, Inc., Signature Worldwide Advisors, LLC, Stephen W. Carnes and Lawrence A. Powalisz)

45. Signature Worldwide incorporates by reference its responses to Paragraphs 1 through 44 of the Answer as if its responses to those allegations were fully repeated herein.

46. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 46 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

47. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 47 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other companies and Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 47.

48. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 48 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

49. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 49 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

COUNT II

DEFENDANTS’ OFFER AND SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 5 (a) AND 5 (c) OF THE SECURITIES ACT

(Against Defendants Enzyme Environmental Solutions, Inc. and Jared E. Hochstedler)

50. Signature Worldwide incorporates by reference its responses to Paragraphs 1 through 49 of the Answer as if its responses to those allegations were fully repeated herein.

51. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 51.

52. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 52.

53. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 53.

54. Signature Worldwide denies the allegations in Paragraph 54 that pertain to it. Signature Worldwide is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Defendant, Signature Worldwide Advisors, LLC. respectfully requests that the Court dismiss Count I of the Complaint and that it be awarded all costs and all other relief the Court deems equitable and just; and The Defendant demands a Trial by Jury as to all issues raised in any and all counts of the Complaint that are so triable.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

1. Failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted.

2. The securities that are the subject of the Complaint were exempt from registration, under Section 4 (1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”). Signature Worldwide did not act as an issuer, underwriter or dealer in any of the transactions listed in the Complaint.

3. The securities that are the subject of the Complaint were exempt from registration, under Section 4 (2) of the Securities Act. Signature Worldwide was not involved in a public offering.

4. Signature Worldwide acted in good faith and relied on advice of counsel when selling the securities that are the subject of the Complaint. Signature Worldwide received a written opinion from counsel, after full disclosure, and relied upon said opinion.

5. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which the Plaintiff would be entitled to a Permanent Injunction.

6. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which Plaintiff would be entitled to a Penny Stock Bar.

7. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which the Plaintiff would be entitled to disgorgement and prejudgment interest.

8. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which the Plaintiff would be entitled to a civil penalty.

9. Signature Worldwide reserves the right to assert additional defenses as they become known.

Respectfully submitted this 25th day of November, 2009.

/s/Irving M. Einhorn
IRVING M. EINHORN
Law Offices of Irving. M. Einhorn
1710-10th Street
Manhattan Beach, California 90266
ime@einhornlaw.com

/s/Harrison T. Slaughter, Jr.
HARRISON T. SLAUGHTER, JR.
Florida Bar No. 194822
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 700
Orlando, Florida 32801
Telephone: 407-849-6161
Facsimile: 407-843-3738
Butch@leventhal-slaughter.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 25th day of November 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will also send a notice of electronic filing to the following:

Jonathan Stephen Polish
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Margaret Gembala Nelson
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Thomas J. Meier
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

I further certify that I caused to be sent by electronic mail the foregoing document to the
following:

Thomas W. Farlow
Thomas E. Satrom
Frost Brown Todd LLC
201 N. Illinois Street, Suite 1900
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
e-mail: tfarlow@fbtlaw.com
e-mail: tsatrom@fbtlaw.com

Charles M. Greene
Law Offices of Chares M. Greene, PA
28 E Washington Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
e-mail: cmglaw@cmgpa.com

Daniel Bobilya
Bobilya & Reidy LLP
127 W. Berry Street
Suite 300
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
e-mail: dbobilya@b-rlegal.com

Dated: November 25, 2009



To: scion who wrote (109262)11/26/2009 11:46:40 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
DEFENDANT STEPHEN W. CARNES’ ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

11/25/2009 34 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to 1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Stephen W. Carnes.(Slaughter, Harrison) (Entered: 11/25/2009)

Doc 34 PDF file
viewer.zoho.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Case No. 6:09-cv-1638-GAP-KRS
Plaintiff

v.

K&L INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC.,
SIGNATURE LEISURE, INC., SIGNATURE
WORLDWIDE ADVISORS, LLC, STEPHEN W.
CARNES, LAWRENCE A. POWALISZ,
ENZYME ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
INC. and JARED E. HOCHSTEDLER,
Defendants.
__________________________________________/

DEFENDANT STEPHEN W. CARNES’ ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Defendant, Stephen W. Carnes. (“Carnes”), by the undersigned counsel, hereby answers and defends the Complaint filed by Plaintiff, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, as follows:

ANSWER

NATURE OF THE CASE

1. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 1 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

2. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 2.

3. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 3 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

4. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 4 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

5. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 5 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6. Carnes admits the allegations in Paragraph 6.

7. Carnes admits that Venue lies with this Court, however, Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the remaining allegations, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 7.

DEFENDANTS

8. Carnes admits the allegations in Paragraph 8.

9. Carnes admits the allegations in Paragraph 9.

10. Carnes admits the allegations in Paragraph 10.

11. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 11.

12. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 12.

13. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 13.

14. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 14.

THE ISSUER COMPANIES

15. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 15.

16. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 16.

17. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 17.

FACTS

18. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 18 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

THE REVENGE PROMISSORY NOTES

19. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 19.

20. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 20.

21. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 21.

22. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants and therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 22.

23. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants and therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 23.

24. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants and therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 24.

THE WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS:

AN OVERVIEW

25. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 25.

26. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 26.

THE CROSS ATLANTIC WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

27. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 27.

28. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 28.

29. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 29.

30. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 30.

THE REVENGE DESIGNS WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

31. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 31.

32. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 32.

33. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 33.

34. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 34.

THE ENZYME ENVIRONMENTAL WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

35. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 35.

36. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 36.

37. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 37.

38. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 38.

39. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 39.

40. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 40 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

THE INTERNATIONAL POWER WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

41. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 41.

42. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 42.

43. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 43.

44. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 44.

COUNT I

DEFENDANTS’ OFFER AND SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 5 (a) AND 5 (c) OF THE SECURITIES ACT

(Against Defendants K&L International Enterprises, Inc., Signature Leisure, Inc., Signature Worldwide Advisors, LLC, Stephen W. Carnes and Lawrence A. Powalisz)

45. Carnes incorporates by reference his responses to Paragraphs 1 through 44 of the Answer as if his responses to those allegations were fully repeated herein.

46. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 46 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

47. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 47 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other companies and Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

48. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 48 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

49. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 49 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

COUNT II

DEFENDANTS’ OFFER AND SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 5 (a) AND 5 (c) OF THE SECURITIES ACT

(Against Defendants Enzyme Environmental Solutions, Inc. and Jared E. Hochstedler)

50. Carnes incorporates by reference his responses to Paragraphs 1 through 49 of the Answer as if his responses to those allegations were fully repeated herein.

51. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 51.

52. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 52.

53. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 53.

54. Carnes denies the allegations in Paragraph 54 that pertain to him. Carnes is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Defendant, Stephen W. Carnes, respectfully requests that the Court dismiss Count I of the Complaint and that he be awarded all costs and all other relief the Court deems equitable and just; and

The Defendant demands a Trial by Jury as to all issues raised in any and all counts of the Complaint that are so triable.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

1. Failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted.

2. The securities that are the subject of the Complaint were exempt from registration, under Section 4 (1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”). Carnes did not act as an issuer, underwriter or dealer in any of the transactions listed in the Complaint.

3. The securities that are the subject of the Complaint were exempt from registration, under Section 4 (2) of the Securities Act. Carnes was not involved in a public offering.

4. Carnes acted in good faith and relied on advice of counsel when selling the securities that are the subject of the Complaint. Carnes received a written opinion from counsel, after full disclosure, and relied upon said opinion.

5. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which the Plaintiff would be entitled to a Permanent Injunction.

6. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which Plaintiff would be entitled to a Penny Stock Bar.

7. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which the Plaintiff would be entitled to disgorgement and prejudgment interest.

8. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which the Plaintiff would be entitled to a civil penalty.

9. Carnes reserves the right to assert additional defenses as they become known.

Respectfully submitted this 25th day of November, 2009.

/s/Irving M. Einhorn
IRVING M. EINHORN
Law Offices of Irving. M. Einhorn
1710-10th Street
Manhattan Beach, California 90266
ime@einhornlaw.com

/s/Harrison T. Slaughter, Jr.
HARRISON T. SLAUGHTER, JR.
Florida Bar No. 194822
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 700
Orlando, Florida 32801
Telephone: 407-849-6161
Facsimile: 407-843-3738
Butch@leventhal-slaughter.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 25th day of November 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will also send a notice of electronic filing to the following:

Jonathan Stephen Polish
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Margaret Gembala Nelson
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Thomas J. Meier
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

I further certify that I caused to be sent by electronic mail the foregoing document to the following:

Thomas W. Farlow
Thomas E. Satrom
Frost Brown Todd LLC
201 N. Illinois Street, Suite 1900
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
e-mail: tfarlow@fbtlaw.com
e-mail: tsatrom@fbtlaw.com

Charles M. Greene
Law Offices of Chares M. Greene, PA
28 E Washington Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
e-mail: cmglaw@cmgpa.com

Daniel Bobilya
Bobilya & Reidy LLP
127 W. Berry Street
Suite 300
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
e-mail: dbobilya@b-rlegal.com

Dated: November 25, 2009



To: scion who wrote (109262)11/26/2009 11:47:30 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

11/25/2009 35 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by K & L International Enterprises, Inc., Signature Leisure, Inc., Jared E. Hochstedler, Signature Worldwide Advisors, LLC, Stephen W. Carnes, Lawrence A. Powalisz, Enzyme Enviromental Solutions, Inc.. (Slaughter, Harrison) (Entered: 11/25/2009)

Doc 35 PDF file
viewer.zoho.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Case No. 6:09-cv-1638-GAP-KRS
Plaintiff

v.

K&L INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC.,
SIGNATURE LEISURE, INC., SIGNATURE
WORLDWIDE ADVISORS, LLC, STEPHEN W.
CARNES, LAWRENCE A. POWALISZ,
ENZYME ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
INC. and JARED E. HOCHSTEDLER,
Defendants.
__________________________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

I hereby disclose the following pursuant to this Court’s interested persons order:

1. The name of each person, attorney, association of persons, firm, law firm, partnership, and corporation that has or may have an interest in the outcome of this action, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, publicly-traded companies that own 10% or more of a party’s stock, and all other identifiable legal entities related to any party in the case:

Harrison T. Slaughter, co-counsel for K&L International Enterprises, Inc., Signature Leisure, Inc., Signature Worldwide Advisors, LLC, Stephen W. Carnes, and Lawrence A. Powalisz.
Law Offices of Irving M. Einhorn, co-counsel for K&L International Enterprises, Inc., Signature Leisure, Inc., Signature Worldwide Advisors, LLC, Stephen W. Carnes, and Lawrence A. Powalisz.
Irving M. Einhorn, Esquire
Harrison T. Slaughter, Esquire
Daniel Bobilya, Esquire
Charles M. Greene, Esquire
Margaret Gembala Nelson, Esquire
Thomas J. Meier, Esquire
Jonathan S. Polish, Esquire
Thomas W. Farlow, Esquire
Thomas E. Satrom, Esquire
K&L International Enterprises, Inc.
Lawrence A. Powalisz
Signature Leisure, Inc.
Signature Worldwide Advisors, LLC.
Stephen W. Carnes
Enzyme Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Jared E. Hochstedler, CEO, Enzyme Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Cross Atlantic Commodities, Inc.
Revenge Designs, Inc.
International Power Group, LTC.

2. The name of every other entity whose publicly-traded stock, equity, or debt may be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceedings:

Unknown at this time.

3. The name of every other entity which is likely to be an active participant in the proceedings, including the debtor and members of the creditors’ committee (or 20 largest secured creditors) in bankruptcy cases:

None.

4. The name of each victim (individual or corporate) of civil and criminal conduct alleged to be wrongful, including every person who may be entitled to restitution:

None.
I hereby certify that, except as disclosed above, I am unaware of any actual or potential conflict of interest involving the District Judge and Magistrate Judge assigned to this case, and will immediately notify the Court in writing upon learning of any such conflict.

Respectfully submitted this 25th day of November, 2009.

/s/Irving M. Einhorn
IRVING M. EINHORN
Law Offices of Irving. M. Einhorn
1710-10th Street
Manhattan Beach, California 90266
ime@einhornlaw.com

/s/Harrison T. Slaughter, Jr.
HARRISON T. SLAUGHTER, JR.
Florida Bar No. 194822
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 700
Orlando, Florida 32801
Telephone: 407-849-6161
Facsimile: 407-843-3738
Butch@leventhal-slaughter.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 25th day of November 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will also send a notice of electronic filing to the following:

Jonathan Stephen Polish
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Margaret Gembala Nelson
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Thomas J. Meier
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

I further certify that I caused to be sent by electronic mail the foregoing document to the following:

Thomas W. Farlow
Thomas E. Satrom
Frost Brown Todd LLC
201 N. Illinois Street, Suite 1900
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
e-mail: tfarlow@fbtlaw.com
e-mail: tsatrom@fbtlaw.com

Charles M. Greene
Law Offices of Chares M. Greene, PA
28 E Washington Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
e-mail: cmglaw@cmgpa.com

Daniel Bobilya
Bobilya & Reidy LLP
127 W. Berry Street
Suite 300
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
e-mail: dbobilya@b-rlegal.com

Dated: November 25, 2009



To: scion who wrote (109262)11/26/2009 11:49:04 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
DEFENDANT SIGNATURE LEISURE, INC.’S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

11/25/2009 36 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to 1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Signature Leisure, Inc..(Slaughter, Harrison) (Entered: 11/25/2009)

Doc 36 PDF file
viewer.zoho.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Case No. 6:09-cv-1638-GAP-KRS
Plaintiff

v.

K&L INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC.,
SIGNATURE LEISURE, INC., SIGNATURE
WORLDWIDE ADVISORS, LLC, STEPHEN W.
CARNES, LAWRENCE A. POWALISZ,
ENZYME ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
INC. and JARED E. HOCHSTEDLER,
Defendants.
__________________________________________/

DEFENDANT SIGNATURE LEISURE, INC.’S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Defendant, Signature Leisure, Inc. (“Signature Leisure”), by the undersigned counsel, hereby answers and defends the Complaint filed by Plaintiff, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, as follows:

ANSWER

NATURE OF THE CASE

1. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 1 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

2. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 2.

3. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 3 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

4. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 4 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

5. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 5 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6. Signature Leisure admits the allegations in Paragraph 6.

7. Signature Leisure admits that Venue lies with this Court, however, Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the remaining allegations, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 7.

DEFENDANTS

8. Signature Leisure admits the allegations in Paragraph 8.

9. Signature Leisure admits the allegations in Paragraph 9.

10. Signature Leisure admits the allegations in Paragraph 10.

11. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 11.

12. Signature Leisure admits the allegations contained in Paragraph Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 12.

13. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 13.

14. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 14.

THE ISSUER COMPANIES

15. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 15.

16. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 16.

17. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 17.

FACTS

18. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 18 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

THE REVENGE PROMISSORY NOTES

19. Signature Leisure admits that it entered into agreements with Revenge Designs, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Leisure further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to Revenge, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph19.

20. Signature Leisure admits that it entered into agreements with Revenge Designs, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Leisure further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to Revenge, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 20.

21. Signature Leisure admits that it entered into agreements with Revenge Designs, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Leisure further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to Revenge, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 21.

22. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 22.

23. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 23.

24. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 24.

THE WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS:

AN OVERVIEW

25. Signature Leisure admits that it entered into agreements with Revenge Designs and International Power, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Leisure further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 25.

26. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 26.

THE CROSS ATLANTIC WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

27. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 27.

28. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 28.

29. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 29.

30. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 30.

THE REVENGE DESIGNS WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

31. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 31.

32. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 32.

33. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 33.

34. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 34.

THE ENZYME ENVIRONMENTAL WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

35. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 35.

36. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 36.

37. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 37.

38. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 38.

39. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 39.

40. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 40.

THE INTERNATIONAL POWER WRAP-AROUND AGREEMENTS

41. Signature Leisure admits that it entered into agreements with International Power, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Leisure further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to International Power, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 41.

42. Signature Leisure admits that it entered into agreements with International Power, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Leisure further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to International Power, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 42.

43. Signature Leisure admits that it entered into agreements with International Power, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Leisure further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to International Power, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 43.

44. Signature Leisure admits that it entered into agreements with International Power, and that the documentation for those transactions must be read as a whole. Signature Leisure further admits that the terms and conditions contained in the documentation governed the transactions in question. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to International Power, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 44.

COUNT I

DEFENDANTS’ OFFER AND SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 5 (a) AND 5 (c) OF THE SECURITIES ACT

(Against Defendants K&L International Enterprises, Inc., Signature Leisure, Inc., Signature Worldwide Advisors, LLC, Stephen W. Carnes and Lawrence A. Powalisz)

45. Signature Leisure incorporates by reference its responses to Paragraphs 1 through 44 of the Answer as if its responses to those allegations were fully repeated herein.

46. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 46 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

47. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 47 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other companies and Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 47.

48. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 48 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

49. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 49 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

COUNT II

DEFENDANTS’ OFFER AND SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 5 (a) AND 5 (c) OF THE SECURITIES ACT

(Against Defendants Enzyme Environmental Solutions, Inc. and Jared E. Hochstedler)

50. Signature Leisure incorporates by reference its responses to Paragraphs 1 through 49 of the Answer as if its responses to those allegations were fully repeated herein.

51. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 51.

52. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 52.

53. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the allegations in Paragraph 53.

54. Signature Leisure denies the allegations in Paragraph 54 that pertain to it. Signature Leisure is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the allegations that pertain to other Defendants, and as such, therefore denies the remaining allegations.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Defendant, Signature Leisure, Inc. respectfully requests that the Court dismiss Count I of the Complaint and that it be awarded all costs and all other relief the Court deems equitable and just; and

The Defendant demands a Trial by Jury as to all issues raised in any and all counts of the Complaint that are so triable.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

1. Failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted.

2. The securities that are the subject of the Complaint were exempt from registration, under Section 4 (1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”). Signature Leisure did not act as an issuer, underwriter or dealer in any of the transactions listed in the Complaint.

3. The securities that are the subject of the Complaint were exempt from registration, under Section 4 (2) of the Securities Act. Signature Leisure was not involved in a public offering.

4. Signature Leisure acted in good faith and relied on advice of counsel when selling the securities that are the subject of the Complaint. Signature Leisure received a written opinion from counsel, after full disclosure, and relied upon said opinion.

5. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which the Plaintiff would be entitled to a Permanent Injunction.

6. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which Plaintiff would be entitled to a Penny Stock Bar.

7. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which the Plaintiff would be entitled to disgorgement and prejudgment interest.

8. To the extent that Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act apply, and without acknowledging or admitting that any violations occurred, the Complaint fails to state a basis upon which the Plaintiff would be entitled to a civil penalty.

9. Signature Leisure reserves the right to assert additional defenses as they become known.

Respectfully submitted this 25th day of November, 2009.

/s/Irving M. Einhorn
IRVING M. EINHORN
Law Offices of Irving. M. Einhorn
1710-10th Street
Manhattan Beach, California 90266
ime@einhornlaw.com

/s/Harrison T. Slaughter, Jr.
HARRISON T. SLAUGHTER, JR.
Florida Bar No. 194822
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 700
Orlando, Florida 32801
Telephone: 407-849-6161
Facsimile: 407-843-3738
Butch@leventhal-slaughter.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 25th day of November 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will also send a notice of electronic filing to the following:

Jonathan Stephen Polish
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Margaret Gembala Nelson
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Thomas J. Meier
Securities & Exchange Commission
175 West Jackson Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604

I further certify that I caused to be sent by electronic mail the foregoing document to the
following:

Irving M. Einhorn
Law Offices of Irving M. Einhorn
1710 – 10th Street
Manhattan Beach, California 90266
e-mail: ime@einhornlaw.com

Thomas W. Farlow
Thomas E. Satrom
Frost Brown Todd LLC
201 N. Illinois Street, Suite 1900
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
e-mail: tfarlow@fbtlaw.com
e-mail: tsatrom@fbtlaw.com

Charles M. Greene
Law Offices of Chares M. Greene, PA
28 E Washington Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
e-mail: cmglaw@cmgpa.com

Daniel Bobilya
Bobilya & Reidy LLP
127 W. Berry Street
Suite 300
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
e-mail: dbobilya@b-rlegal.com

Dated: November 25, 2009