Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Earlie who wrote (68182)	11/27/2009 5:55:49 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78426

I disagree that Ventana is better off being with Greystar. It won't erase their title problems if they joint with them. The better orebody is the Ventana one because grade erases many metallurgical difficulties. Greystar has a ways to go yet to define a process that makes them economic. Not so Ventana. The depth of Ventana's orebody is immaterial. That is just the depth of the drilling, which is a good thing, not a bad thing. Title has always been a problem all over South America, with the exceptions of Guyana and Chile. There are always multiple layers of ownership on the land, gangsters and other corruption interfering. For a while the worst was Brazil which if you had gold and were near roads, was a multilingual garmimpeiro mix up. Greystar had trouble with title too, as it did not own all the concessions that were part of the geological package at one time. I am told this has since been resolved. EC<:-}