To: dvdw© who wrote (58398 ) 11/27/2009 12:00:49 PM From: koan 2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217650 >>But say you are playing no limit there is no such game, there are always constraints....no limit is a myth>> koan: "The above paragraph tells me you just like to argue. Everyone knows (except you I guess) what no limit poker means." No limit is now the most popular poker game in the world. You can bet as much as you have in front of you." It is the name of the game, like chess is the name of a game. gheewesh-lol. >>but a great player like Doyle Brunson can beat 95% of the people in the world and not even look at his cards, as long as no one knew he was not looking. "" easy to defeat this guys edge by adapting to his terms, if he plays blind so should the opponent, then the 95% figure used in your comment would simply be erased.>> koan/me: you are misunderstanding what I said. I am saying Brunson did not need to look at his cards to beat 95% of the poker players in the world because he knew the art of bluffing so well. He wrote the book. Brunson was the first to explain the art of power poker. And no one can easily beat Brunson under any circumstances, are you nuts-lol. Do you know who he is? He won the world series of poker 2/3? times. koan again: "The stuff below is just psychobable. It was science that gave us modern day civilzation, medicene, put rockets on the moon, built the hydrogen bomb, built lasers, and gave us a more sophisticated understanding of the world and universe through relativity and quantum physics. All that stuff is very real and humans never were able to do it before science. Why do you not just try to understand things instead of playing games? >>a word science and the importance of science. science is just iterated compounding interest, its a limited set of facts and figures subject to terms itself does not hold dear, one of them is Degrees of Freedom....there are many others of course. We are all nuts and live a life of illusion. So how do we sift out the ilusion. Science. Hit reset, and find your own contradictions. the rhetoric of poly science rings through, adds no value, your reply is full of superficial description that is all too circular.