SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (336074)11/27/2009 9:24:07 PM
From: Nadine Carroll4 Recommendations  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 794299
 
It's important to state the skeptic's case accurately, I think.

We don't know there is no global warming; for all we know, there might be. But we do know that the CRU scientists have been cooking the books to juice their arguments and have refused to release their data or models to third parties for open review. Instead, they used strong-arm tactics to intimidate the skeptics and turn peer review into a closed circle.

Ask, why would they need to do that, if the evidence for AGW was as strong as they say?



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (336074)11/27/2009 9:29:32 PM
From: MichaelSkyy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794299
 
Copy of E-Mail I sent to my pals & E-Mail list:

(one pal is a 'LIB' and one is my "LIB" daughter)

As a public service message for news in the world that you "probably"
don't see reported in the NY TIMES, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, PBS, NPR
or any of the so called fringe or lame stream media!!! I forward these links:

google.com

Edit: Everyone else is "Conservative" !!!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News