Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Manmade Global Warming, A hoax? A Scam? or a Doomsday Cult? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (215)	11/28/2009 7:19:14 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Respond to of 4326

and...... TomD Posted November 28, 2009 at 4:10 pm \| Permalink Leonard Ornstein Says: 1) The most important is: does the behavior of the scientists involved significantly weaken the collective AGW position that warming is real, that it will probably continue with business as usual, and that such warming will probably subject humanity (and ecosystems) to severe risks? The answer to this one should be a resounding, NO. TomD Says: This sounds like more “the science is in” and “there is a consensus”. But in fact the answer is YES! To be a little redundant here, “if the answer to this one is a resounding, NO”, why is it necessary to fudge data, withhold information and manipulate the peer review process. The most important thing that the AGW society needs to prove is that global warming is bad for humans, animals and plants. That’s going to be a tough one, cuz it just ain’t the case. Next the AGW crew must prove that there is global warming that is above and beyond normal cyclical variations for an interglacial period. Next the AGWers have to prove that humans are the cause of the global warming. When the AGWers can show that the current climate conditions are an anomaly to past interglacial periods, it will give them some credibility. Until then….Ho Hum.