SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (336271)11/29/2009 10:18:03 AM
From: Nadine Carroll5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
It boggles the mind that any scientist would be so sure of his adjustments that he would throw away the raw data. This is not science. Doubly so when you consider that the amount of adjustment needed to compensate for Urban Heat effects (150 years ago the thermometer was in a village; now it's in a city; presto, higher temps) has always been contentious. The CRU decided to win the argument by force.



To: LindyBill who wrote (336271)11/29/2009 11:39:59 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
I don't believe it for a minute. Academic data collectors never throw away original sourced data spanning 150 years. They scan it, archive it and put the books and binders in some basement file cabinets.



To: LindyBill who wrote (336271)11/29/2009 5:18:44 PM
From: Whitebeard  Respond to of 793964
 
lies and damned lies.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News