SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (533309)11/29/2009 10:43:18 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1585088
 
"Not as long as that militia phrase is in there.....it was put there for a purpose.."

True. If you read the "Federalist Papers", the FFs had the idea that the only standing military they needed was the officer corps and maybe a few soldiers. They wanted to be able to tap the militias on an as-needed basis. The problem is, that didn't work out too well. The militias didn't take orders well and tended to vanish when they were needed. After several tries, they quietly dropped the idea.

But that still doesn't change the fact that gun ownership is written into the Constitution. Even though one of the major reasons for it didn't work out.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (533309)11/30/2009 1:14:25 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Respond to of 1585088
 
It wasn't put in there to limit the people's right to keep and bear arms but to justify it.