SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (336436)11/30/2009 9:44:40 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Respond to of 793838
 
Could Nader run against Chris Dodd?
Sunday, November 29, 2009
By RONALD DEROSA

NORFOLK — Could consumer activist and Winsted native Ralph Nader pitch a run as Connecticut’s next freshman senator?

The answer: Maybe.

When asked if he is considering running for the U.S. Senate as a candidate in 2010, Nader told a book discussion group gathered at the Norfolk Public Library: “We’ll see.” Nader, who has been on tour promoting his book “Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us!” said he has been getting a lot of feedback from Connecticut residents, activists and party members about a possible bid to unseat sitting U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd next year.

But in commenting about a possible senate run, Nader characterized the U.S. Senate’s format — specifically the hold of a super majority — as “restricting.”

“(The senate) is paralyzing an already paralyzed government,” the former 2000 and 2004 presidential candidate told the local residents packed in the library’s Great Room. Nader commented that bills sent over from the U.S. House often “die” in the U.S. Senate.

In an interview with The Register Citizen, Nader said Connecticut is fortunate to have the ability to allow multiple parties to sponsor a candidate. Recently the state’s Green Party has encouraged Nader to run, and if he decides to do so, Nader could be cross-endorsed by other minor parties.

“We want to help all of the small parties,” Nader said. “Help them in the future to provide more competition.”

He has described the current two-party system as having a hold on national politics. It remains to be seen whether Nader would decide to run independently or under a party endorsement.

But Nader declined to comment on his chances on winning a senate seat — against Dodd and whomever Republican hopeful gets the nod next year.

“I’m nowhere near to even being able to answer that question,” he said, saying it was too early to tell.

The current political mood in the state at this point is very “anti-incumbent, I’m told,” Nader said. In speaking about Dodd, he invoked Linda McMahon, a Republican vying for the spot, who was a former chief executive for World Wrestling Entertainment.

“When someone who has been involved in the wrestling business ties him (in polls), you’ve got to believe there’s an anti-incumbent mood,” he said.

A recent Quinnipiac University poll shows McMahon leading Dodd 43 percent to 41 percent in a hypothetical match-up.

A registered voter in Connecticut, Nader, 75, stopped at the Norfolk Public Library for a discussion about his fictional work, which profiles the efforts of 17 mega-wealthy individuals in America who work together for the common good.

Nader recently spoke in Washington, Conn., and on Friday he spoke in West Hartford, as part of a national tour. After his speech, book discussion and signing in Norfolk, Nader spoke also in Waterbury.

Apparently overshadowing some of his talks are questions about the possible senate bid. In Norfolk, while the discussion was mostly about the book, Jacob Werblow, assistance professor of education at Central Connecticut State University, took a minute to ask the question whether Nader was mulling a senate run. “The time is right,” Werblow told The Register Citizen. “Especially with Dodd and ethics violations.”

Bill Koldys, of Torrington, said he thought Nader’s book speech was both “informative and frightening,” specifically about the super majority aspect of the senate. He said he would choose Nader over the current incumbents. “I think (Nader) would be a voice for the people that the people have not had in the state over the terms of Dodd and Lieberman,” Koldys said.

A Quinnipiac University Poll released Nov. 12 showed 54 percent of voters disapprove of the job that Dodd is doing, up from 49 percent in September. The same survey showed the five-term incumbent Democrat particularly vulnerable among unaffiliated voters, the largest voting bloc in an otherwise Democratic-leaning state. More than 100 people turned out to hear Nader talk in West Hartford, including some Green Party members who held signs that read, “Run Ralph Run!” The state’s Green Party has been stepping up efforts to encourage Nader to get into the race, saying this marks one of the best opportunities for the Greens to win a senate seat. Tim McKee, a Green Party spokesman in Connecticut, told the Associated Press Dodd’s low poll numbers give his party one of their best opportunities. Nader would not be a spoiler — something he was accused of in the 2000 presidential election, McKee said.

“A lot of Democrats would be upset about the prospect (of Nader entering the race). But we look at it as (he’s) already lost the seat,” McKee told the AP.

In the 2000 presidential election, Nader ran as the Green Party’s candidate and got 2.7 percent of the vote. Nader told The Register Citizen that state residents want to see a senator who does “the right thing,” specifically with senate banking legislation. Dodd, the state’s five-term senior senator, is the Senate Banking Committee Chairman and is responsible for much legislation passed by the committee.

Nader said there is a need for a consumer association amendment for a consumer association that would require bank and brokerage houses to put electronic inserts into their mail outs, asking residents to join a non-profit consumer lobby. He said he spoke with Dodd and U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-NY, with the hope that the amendment be included in the senate’s upcoming banking bill.

If Nader jumped in as an independent candidate, he would be joining an already crowded field on both sides. On the Republican front McMahon, former U.S. Congressman Rob Simmons, former Ambassador Tom Foley and pundit Peter Schiff. On the Democrats’ side is Merrick Alpert, former Airforce officer.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Ronald DeRosa can be reached by e-mail at torrington@registercitizen.com.

registercitizen.com



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (336436)11/30/2009 10:32:36 AM
From: KLP1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793838
 
Many of the States, including WA, have decided to let some prisoners go free earlier.....Could this have been the reason that Clemmons was set free from a Pierce Co jail a week ago????

Washington state may release more seriously ill prisoners to save money.

August 01, 2009

RACHEL LA CORTE
Associated Press Writer
July 30, 2009

realcostofprisons.org
realcostofprisons.org

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — About two dozen seriously ill prisoners in Washington state could soon be released from prison — as long as their freedom is expected to save the cash-strapped state money.

A new state law, which takes effect Saturday, expands a current program to release chronically or terminally ill prisoners. Death row inmates, or those serving life sentences without the possibility of parole, are not eligible for early release.

Washington is among more than 30 states that have some form of early release program for seriously ill prisoners, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The move will save the Washington state Department of Corrections an estimated $800,000 over the next two years, mainly on things like prescription costs and transporting prisoners to off-prison medical treatment.

But the state Department of Social and Health Services estimates it could see significant increases in its budget if it has to place all of those released in state-paid nursing homes or provide additional mental health services — offsetting any savings and possibly adding more costs to the already hampered state budget.

That frustrates some lawmakers like Rep. Bruce Dammeier, R-Puyallup. He voted in favor of the bill twice while it was moving through legislative committees, but ultimately voted against it on the House floor because of concerns over costs. The state had to make major cuts this year to patch a $9 billion budget deficit.

"I was prepared to speak out in support of this bill in our caucus room, and then as I reviewed the fiscal note again, it had changed," Dammeier said. "It's not clear-cut, it's not easy to define, and it's not going to clearly result in savings."

The number of prisoners who would actually be released is unknown. Also unclear is how many of those released would end up relying on social safety net programs.

Even the state corrections chief admits the program expansion is a work in progress.

"We continue to think this will save the state money, but we won't know that for sure until we're down the road," said Corrections Secretary Eldon Vail. "Will it in every case?

That's the goal. You can't know until they leave the system."
Under the law signed by Democratic Gov. Chris Gregoire in May, the head of corrections can authorize early medical release only if certain conditions are met. The offender must have a serious medical condition that is expected "to require costly care or treatment." They must pose a low risk to the community because they are physically incapacitated or expected to be at the time of release. And the release must be expected to save the state money.

The department works to see if prisoners qualify for private or veteran's health coverage. Barring other options, they arrange for Medicaid, which is paid for partially by the state and partly with federal money.

Vail said there have been cases of some prisoners with such serious health problems that they were sent to state nursing homes or intensive care, with an armed guard paid to be with them. So under the program, not much changes except the lack of a guard, he said.

"The state is still paying for the hospital bed, but the state is no longer paying for the correctional officer to stand watch," Vail said.

The main change to the current early release program, which has been in place since 1999, is that it no longer requires the prisoner be incapacitated before being approved for release. Fifty-five offenders have been released since 1999 under the earlier program, and two more have been approved and are currently awaiting placement in the community.

Sherry Lynn Bradford, a 40-year-old prisoner at the Washington Corrections Center for Women near Gig Harbor, hopes that she will be one of the prisoners released under the new expanded law. Bradford, who has hepatitis C and has had two surgeries to address liver failure, was denied parole last year under the old program because she wasn't yet incapacitated.
She said that during her last surgery earlier this month, "my doctor didn't sugarcoat it."

"He said my liver is very sick and the only way I'm going to live is to get a new one," she said.

Bradford has been in and out of prison since 1997 on drug charges, with her most recent conviction in 2006 for possession of a controlled substance, with intent to manufacture or deliver cocaine. She is set to be released on probation in December. She said she hopes she can be out before then under medical parole in hopes that she can get on a transplant list sooner.

"I really can't do anything from behind bars," she said.
Her application hasn't yet been decided, and Vail said every request will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

"It's a balancing act between trying to make sure a person receives proper care in a way that is cost effective," he said. "It's not a black-and-white decision. It all depends on the individual."
___
The early medical parole bill is House Bill 2194.
___
On the Web:
Washington Legislature: leg.wa.gov
Gov. Chris Gregoire: governor.wa.gov
Washington State Department of Corrections: doc.wa.gov
latimes.com



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (336436)11/30/2009 11:01:40 AM
From: ManyMoose  Respond to of 793838
 
Rotate bunks like they do in the submarine service.