SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas Leavitt who wrote (7098)11/1/1997 6:22:00 PM
From: Bill Lin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
12PE is a backward looking PE. Q4 is around $0.00-$0.10 at best (negative at worst)
Q1 '98 and Q2 '98 is the same.
Q3 is $0.00-$0.24 (if GX3 gets a ton of design wins).

forward looking PE is about 20, as far as i am guessing. but then i am REAL pessimistic.

"undergoing expansion out of traditional channels" doesn't make any money right now. Revenues from '96 to '97 growth is around 10%. earnings decline.

so, my answer is "no" its not excessive.

my argument for a while has been: if S3 is now a value play, then it has to become CHEAP or sell for around 0.5-0.7 times book. right now, there are several "potential" factors holding up the price at $8+, which are Faroudja tech, fab value, and GX3 in silicon.

Otherwise, it can trade at 10X forward '98 PE or $3-4.

are YOU going to buy the #9 GX2 board?

BL



To: Thomas Leavitt who wrote (7098)11/2/1997 3:44:00 PM
From: Michael  Respond to of 14577
 
>Anyone think a P/E ratio of 12 is excessively low for a primier
>player in a critical market niche that is undergoing expansion out
>of traditional channels?

I think the key issue is that is the P/E really going to stay 12? With decreasing earnings (conference call) the P/E may prove to be a lot higher in the next 3 coming quarters. Though I believe this is a great long term investment and don't question we will see the upper teens again, I worry that disappointing earnings over the next few quarters could batter the stock even more.



To: Thomas Leavitt who wrote (7098)11/2/1997 4:21:00 PM
From: Berney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
Thomas,

I too favor dominant companies in a market niche. Unfortunately, we
tend to make these observations while looking out the back window.
Obviously, hazardous while driving the investment by-ways.

Having made the same mistake (i.e., S3 dominance), I just finished a
newsletter article "Anatomy of a disaster -- S3". I think, for many
us, S3 is going to have to demonstrate this dominance before we will
again be interested. IMO Until then, the stock is not worthy of more
than a short term play as the new batch of suckers buy into the past
performance. S3 is a good lesson for all concerned.

Good Investing

Berney