Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (14522)	12/2/2009 11:53:01 PM
From: The Vet	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

However, climate science is multi-disciplinary and has resulted in many different data sets that all point to a similar conclusion: man made CO2 emissions are the prime cause of increases in CO2 and CO2 is the prime cause of recent warming trends. That's simply untrue mindmeld. If you look at the multi-disciplinary science you will find the majority of it does not support AGW and most of it is looking for effects of warming not proof that the warming is caused by CO2 in any way at all. Evidence of warming ether locally or globally does not prove causation. Just why is it that you cannot understand that correlation does not prove causation, and that lack of consistent correlation is good evidence that causation is absent. CO2 levels have risen consistently for manny years. Global temperatures have not followed that rise and in fact are now dropping in spite of it, in clear contradiction of the AGW theory.