Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : The Microcap Kitchen: Stocks 5¢ to $5 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rogerover who wrote (92442)	12/2/2009 7:15:28 PM
From: dogpound	1 Recommendation Respond to of 120415

sorry rogerover i can't pm...

To: rogerover who wrote (92442)	12/2/2009 8:23:17 PM
From: Rawnoc	Respond to of 120415

rogerover -- excellent point and I think (don't quote me) that JBII did exactly that. Filed a pending application without any intention of actually revealing the entire formula/catalyst/process. I thought I read in a filing or press release or filing about the patent pending for JBII's plastic2oil but the CEO mentioning later in shareholder communication wishing not to have their trade secrets stolen. Again, don't quote me, but if I get bored enough later I'll dig it up. One problem with processes and formulas is that it's so hard to protect your patents because those are much easier to change just a little bit and win in court after years of expensive litigation by the victim who loses anyway. It's very hard to prove that somebody "stole" your exact formula unlike a tech gadget.