Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (26225)	12/3/2009 12:09:58 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Do you really not see the relevance of another environmentalist in government employee being found to have their hand in the till? <And? Relevance? Nice try, dimwit > Again, you confirm by your post that environmentalists use anti-personnel cult norms, not reason and data [which has been dumped with improved data kept]. Mqurice

To: Land Shark who wrote (26225)	12/3/2009 12:16:30 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Global warming controversy hits NASA climate data By Stephen Dinan The fight over climate science is about to cross the Atlantic with a U.S. researcher poised to sue NASA, demanding the release of the same kind of information that landed a leading British center in hot water over charges that it skewed its data. Christopher C. Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said NASA has refused for two years to provide information under the Freedom of Information Act that would show how the agency has shaped its climate data and explain why the agency has repeatedly had to correct its data dating as far back as the 1930s. "I assume that what is there is highly damaging," Mr. Horner said. "These guys are quite clearly bound and determined not to reveal their internal discussions about this." The numbers matter. Under pressure in 2007, NASA recalculated its data and found that 1934, not 1998, was the hottest year in its records for the contiguous 48 states. NASA later changed its data again, and now 1998 and 2006 are tied for the hottest years, with 1934 listed as slightly cooler.