SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (39245)12/3/2009 10:27:41 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 71588
 
Thorley Winston December 2, 2009 4:22 PM

I think that the objections are pretty self-evident:

1) We don’t “need” a new tax to pay for the military operations in Afghanistan. Repeal the Obama-Pelosi-Reid “stimulus” bill and there’s plenty of money to pay for continuing military operations. Or repeal Tom Harkin’s farm bills. Or means-test Medicare and Social Security. If there’s a “sacrifice” to be made, let it be from the tax-eaters and not the tax-payers.

2) The only people naïve enough to believe that there will be an automatic sunset provision on the Obey Tax are the same fools who endorse a Carbon Tax thinking it would be coupled with a cut in income and/or payroll taxes.

3) The military is one of the few things that the federal government does which is expressly covered by the Constitution as opposed to most of what the federal government does which is little more than forcible wealth transference. To the extent that we even ought to have any form of federal taxation, the military is one of the few legitimate reasons for it.

4) As others have pointed out, it’s a transparent political gimmick put forth by opponents of the military operations in Afghanistan. If you care about the deficit, then you do your cause a disservice by allowing the political oxygen to be sucked up by people putting forth gimmicks especially when you know it’s a gimmick.

meganmcardle.theatlantic.com



To: TimF who wrote (39245)12/4/2009 8:51:06 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Deficits are deficits.

A Trillion (and counting) for wars --- not handled on a 'pay-as-you-go-basis' for the first time in our nation's entire history is still STUPID, DISINGENUOUS, DEFICIT-CREATING federal budgeting.