Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (26289)	12/3/2009 7:21:51 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36918

I have been an environmentalist most of my life. I recycled as a kid when it was difficult to find a place to take anything but aluminum. I have really never stopped recycling. The concept of not fouling one's nest is a no brainer. One does not need a PHd to realize it is stupid. So far, CO2 is up to 380 ppm and plants are loving it, needing less water and breathing easier, increasing production. 500 ppm seems unlikely to be a problem. Nor 1000 ppm. But it would be worth doing some real science to see what will happen as CO2 levels increase. Not fake science by fake scientists. Real science. The one major concept that the Climate Alarmism has never gotten past with me was the smell test. The concept that whatever we had done to now was wrong and we suddenly had to implement restriction to restore us to the stone age just never convinced me. It takes way more science than what they have done to sentence mankind to poverty for eternity. The fact that the fraud has been increasingly obvious for several years never seemed to penetrate the hoax deniers.