SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: denizen48 who wrote (126391)12/5/2009 12:29:04 AM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543020
 
You can find the links.

Look up any random fact that you know for certain from an authoritative non-Wiki source. Whatever. The chemistry of a match. The boiling point of menthol. The tensile strength of an aluminum alloy. Life span of a box turtle. Keep it up and report the inaccuracies you find.

The truth is I do this all the time and don't find a pattern of errors. I've yet to find a wrong molecular weight, chemical CAS number, incorrect algorithm, incorrect explanation for a methodology, anything. Maybe blue rhinos are hiding in my underwear, but I should be able to pull one out once in a while if they are that common.

I will say that no authority, human or penned documentation, can demonstrate truth simply with links. I've been posting on the Internet since Usenet days - people argue that black paint dries white, or vice versa. You can show them dried paint samples and they will explain that it is all trick. Don't even get me started about Apollo hoaxers.

I did find the following link which I have some anecdotal reasons to believe is true:

arstechnica.com