Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (534580)	12/9/2009 11:43:14 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578270

>Clearly, there are serious problems with the conviction -- aside from not having any evidence, the prosecutor has a history of charging people based on his disdain for their sexual behaviors. This does not appear to be a case of a drug smuggler caught red-handed in a foreign country. It reeks of a kid being railroaded by a corrupt justice system. I've noticed over the past year that your posts have become increasingly outrageous..........I assume a desperate cry for attention. But seriously, why you think you are qualified to post on a subject you clearly know little about is nothing short of amazing. In the case of A. Knox trial, there is considerable circumstantial evidence that was more than enough to convict whether in the US, the UK or in Italy. In fact, people in the US get convicted on less evidence. Italy's system may be ifferent that the US's but that doesn't make it corrupt nor does it mean that Knox didn't get a fair trial. As for her parents, they would not be the first to not know who their child really is.