Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (534625)	12/5/2009 4:47:08 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1578011

"and I can see there is a credible argument that these "scientists" are making shit up." All of them for all these decades? Really? "There is no evidence to suggest that the "scientists" know anything about it." See, that is what I mean. Bone stupid. There are decades of evidence. Almost all of the work suggests it is true. It takes a real nutcase to take the stance that it is a vast, decades long conspiracy that no one has managed to crack. "I'm not a scientist but I'm no fool, either" No evidence of that. Sorry. "Just as I was able to see the nonsense in your argument that a couple carloads of salt in Puget Sound would make one whet of difference in the environment" Well, that was one of your straw men. You love those guys. You kept trying to make my argument that the salt was uniformly spread across the whole Sound. Which I never said, and you persisted despite me trying to correct you. Most of your "victories" are this way. "it is blatantly obvious to me there is insufficient information on which to base the GW nonsense." So, you are conversant with all of the data? Really? No, you are just FOS. Per usual.