Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tom pope who wrote (126215)	12/5/2009 8:36:11 PM
From: Ken Ludwig	4 Recommendations Respond to of 206092

". . .If we make no preparations then we run the risk of catastrophe. So I'm prepared to accept sacrifices (tax-wise) that will accompany emissions reductions spending in the expectation that they will have a mitigating effect if the theory turns out to indeed be explanatory for the retreat of the ice cap etc phenomena.. . . " Well said. Why we do not use the knowledge we have to conserve and protect this fragile environment we live in as far as we are able, just as a matter of common sense, is quite beyond me. I hear people saying things like "We have enough oil/NG/whatever for a hundred years so what's the problem?" My great grandchildren will live with the consequences of our folly-it's personal and, in the grand scheme of things, 100 years is no time at all.