Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: teevee who wrote (14732)	12/7/2009 1:34:05 PM
From: RetiredNow	1 Recommendation Respond to of 86356

LOL. I went to your site and they are arguing against global warming. So the first thing I do is click on their graph showing temperature and CO2 and it shows both are increasing over the long run. They attempt to hide that fact by looking at temperature anomalies and then showing the regression only for the last few years and then claim that this is proof there is a cooling trend. That's a big joke. It is clear that looking at the whole picture of their graph, that most of the data points after 1997 are above the mean for the base period, which is a clear indicator of continued warming. The other thing they did to make the graph look skewed in favor of their opinion is create a minimum PPM for CO2 at 310, instead of at 330, in order to show the CO2 graph above the temperature graph. Subtle propaganda, but didn't fool me and wouldn't fool anyone familiar with trend analysis. The deniers can't even manipulate opinion properly in their quest to disseminate misinformation. LOLOL.