SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (25292)12/7/2009 3:45:26 PM
From: Real Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71456
 
Yes, and while the answer is relatively simple, it does not
deserve a Nobel Prize - it's impossible. Time and Price
is the only option, and China/India will have to grow
rapidly (another "Asian miracle") until their standard
of living rises enough to offset the benefit of cheap labor.
The Western world will suffer slow (to none) economic growth.
IMHO.



To: carranza2 who wrote (25292)12/7/2009 8:29:00 PM
From: GST4 Recommendations  Respond to of 71456
 
<globalization has been a disaster for the US> Globalization has given the US a 'free ride' -- although the free ride applies to fewer and fewer people over time. We live under the illusion that the rest of the world is eager to work cheap for us -- that the rest of the world is composed of uneducated people who have no choice but to do our work for us. Now we are learning that it is not the case. Our ever slipping relative educational advantage is taking its toll. Our dominant dollar is no longer so dominant. Our military now looks as ineffectual as any military given an impossible mission. Our government is broke.

Globalization means earning a living in a competitive world -- we thought it meant just the opposite.



To: carranza2 who wrote (25292)12/7/2009 8:47:31 PM
From: axial3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71456
 
C2, globalization is a rolling wave. It attacks one country after another, where workers and legislators actually compete for the work - and in the process, get lower wages and benefits, while the host jurisdictions offer incentives and tax breaks.

In the end, everyone gets cheaper shirts, computers and other goods, but the working class that originally made the products can no longer afford them.

So we all get cheap shirts, and only a few have a job at which they can be worn. Are cheap goods worth the cost?

Globalization has been a giant sucker play. The wave will never stop until the middle class has been wiped out worldwide, and "working people" everywhere are corporate serfs.

That is precisely what labor has been predicting for 20-odd years. But it's not just happening to labor: it's gutted the ranks of management and industry, too. The fiction is that globalization brings benefits to everyone: so it does, in terms of product cost. In terms of viable economies? Not.

It wasn't so long ago that news emerged: India is now outsourcing software development to Mexico. So the wave rolls on. One country after another - with its desperate workers - seeks to outperform the next in the name of corporate profitability, while corporate interests bankrupt national and public interests.

Jim



To: carranza2 who wrote (25292)12/8/2009 12:51:25 AM
From: Skeeter Bug2 Recommendations  Respond to of 71456
 
>>Yep, but everyone is too broke or unemployed to buy them<<

who cares... wall street bankers will own everything by then.

just get used to income inequality - it is good for you.

remember, lord blankfein is doing god's work that allows you, a lowly peasant, to work in the first place.

anyone - is this dollar rally for real or are we going to hit the down trend in short order again?