SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: average joe who wrote (26517)12/7/2009 10:40:24 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 36918
 
Oh.Darn.
Won't Atlas get burned up?



To: average joe who wrote (26517)12/7/2009 10:51:07 PM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36918
 
Actually, I predicted, fairly accurately, and certainly closer than government work, this and the next solar cycles [not that the data is fully in yet because it's just beginning, but so far, I'm spot on]. <No one can accurately predict solar cycles and if they tell you they can it is because they are selling something, i.e. their services and tenure >

I'm not selling anything [other than Qualcomm technology and Zenbu]. Nor do I seek tenure or clients.

I offered $1 million backing my theory, but Neo would take the bet: Message 25110729

Mqurice



To: average joe who wrote (26517)12/7/2009 11:49:52 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36918
 
Whoa nelly! Solar output only accounts for 10% of Climate variations. Which means that GW is still happening despite the suns activity being at a low point for the past 2 years. Warming is still continuing. I agree that my "chirping" wont change any of that. You objectionableist boy, may actually feel that yours does.

Can lull in Solar activity head off Climate Change?

boston.com