Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (535298)	12/8/2009 8:44:30 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577833

Bush's opportunities to get bin Laden were POST 9/11. HIS motivations should have been 1000 times stronger than Clinton's, but, he totally failed. Pigfcker. Bin Laden had engineered MULTIPLE attacks against both civilian and military targets when Clinton refused to take him. The Bush administration tried; a reasonable effort was made. He wasn't "afraid" of the process like Clinton was. The strategy that was selected, to use the Northern Alliance, was believed by the people on the ground to be the best strategy. It is too bad the guy got away, but it wasn't for a lack of trying or out of fear as it was with Clinton. Most reasonable people can understand a failed strategy. Most people, if they had the facts of Clinton's failure explained to them, would not find it acceptable.